IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/hal/journl/hal-04463824.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Interpreting EHRs Privacy Paradox through Narrative Theory : A Management Perspective on Digital Health Privacy Challenges
[Le Paradoxe de la Vie Privée dans les DSE : Approche Narrative et Management en Santé Numérique]

Author

Listed:
  • Hanaa Farih

    (Laboratory of Research in Finance, Audit and Governance of Organizations (LARFAGO) - National School of Business and Management – ENCG Settat, Hassan The First University, Settat, Morocco.)

Abstract

The present paper delves into the privacy paradox in Electronic Health Records (EHRs) from the perspective of digital health management, employing narrative theory and a multifaceted analysis of factors influencing individuals' perceptions of privacy risks and benefits associated with EHRs. It scrutinizes how cognitive biases, a lack of awareness or understanding of privacy risks, the prioritization of convenience over privacy concerns, trust in healthcare systems or technology providers, and the perceived benefits outweighing perceived risks collectively shape user behavior and decision-making regarding EHR privacy. The methodological approach is rooted in the application of Narrative Theory, providing a theoretical lens through which the dynamics of the Privacy Paradox are explored, rather than empirical data collection. The results of the conceptual literature review underscore the strategic importance of addressing cognitive biases, enhancing privacy awareness, prioritizing privacy in the user experience, cultivating trust, and communicating balanced narratives about the benefits and risks. This paper emphasizes the integration of narrative-driven strategies into digital health management practices, particularly in privacy communication, patient education, and EHR system design, as effective approaches to navigate the privacy paradox and foster informed decision-making among EHR users. The main conclusion drawn is that Narrative Theory offers a profound framework for understanding and addressing the Privacy Paradox in EHRs, suggesting that a narrative-driven approach in digital health management can significantly contribute to resolving the paradox. The application of Narrative Theory within the realm of digital health management offers a novel perspective, enriching academic discourse and providing researchers and practitioners with a fresh lens to understand and address the Privacy Paradox in EHRs.

Suggested Citation

  • Hanaa Farih, 2024. "Interpreting EHRs Privacy Paradox through Narrative Theory : A Management Perspective on Digital Health Privacy Challenges [Le Paradoxe de la Vie Privée dans les DSE : Approche Narrative et Managem," Post-Print hal-04463824, HAL.
  • Handle: RePEc:hal:journl:hal-04463824
    DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.10656947
    Note: View the original document on HAL open archive server: https://hal.science/hal-04463824
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://hal.science/hal-04463824/document
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.5281/zenodo.10656947?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Pratiksha Gautam & Mohd. Dilshad Ansari & Surender Kumar Sharma, 2019. "Enhanced Security for Electronic Health Care Information Using Obfuscation and RSA Algorithm in Cloud Computing," International Journal of Information Security and Privacy (IJISP), IGI Global, vol. 13(1), pages 59-69, January.
    2. Hung-Pin Shih & Wuqiang Liu, 2023. "Beyond the trade-offs on Facebook: the underlying mechanisms of privacy choices," Information Systems and e-Business Management, Springer, vol. 21(2), pages 353-387, June.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.

      Corrections

      All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:hal:journl:hal-04463824. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

      If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

      If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

      If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

      For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: CCSD (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/ .

      Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

      IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.