IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/hal/journl/hal-04325780.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Negative word of mouth for a failed innovation from higher/lower equity brands : Moderating roles of opinion leadership and consumer testimonials

Author

Listed:
  • M. Deniz Dalman

    (SPBU - Saint Petersburg State University)

  • Subimal Chatterjee

    (Binghamton University [SUNY] - SUNY - State University of New York)

  • Junhong Min

    (MTU - Michigan Technological University)

Abstract

"We investigate how higher versus lower-equity brands attract negative word of mouth (NWOM) from consumers when they fail in the marketplace. We find that the dynamics are conditional on the focal consumers' desire for opinion leadership (OL) and the presence/absence of supporting testimonials for the focal brand. For example, among higher-OL consumers, higher-equity brands attract more (less) NWOM than lower-equity brands in the absence (presence) of testimonials. We show that the pattern emerges, in part, because these consumers wish to stand apart from others and be correct in their assessments when they spread NWOM, and such opportunities present themselves best when higher-equity brands, without supporting testimonials, fail in the marketplace. We discuss how the results can help brand managers insulate their brands from consumer backlash in the event of brand failures."

Suggested Citation

  • M. Deniz Dalman & Subimal Chatterjee & Junhong Min, 2020. "Negative word of mouth for a failed innovation from higher/lower equity brands : Moderating roles of opinion leadership and consumer testimonials," Post-Print hal-04325780, HAL.
  • Handle: RePEc:hal:journl:hal-04325780
    DOI: 10.1016/j.jbusres.2020.04.041
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    To our knowledge, this item is not available for download. To find whether it is available, there are three options:
    1. Check below whether another version of this item is available online.
    2. Check on the provider's web page whether it is in fact available.
    3. Perform a search for a similarly titled item that would be available.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:hal:journl:hal-04325780. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: CCSD (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.