IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/hal/journl/hal-04132049.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Expectativas de los peregrinos y estrategia de los actores públicos: el caso del Camino de Santiago

Author

Listed:
  • Frederic Dosquet

    (Centre de recherche de l'ESC Pau - ESC PAU - Ecole Supérieure de Commerce, Pau Business School)

  • Stéphane Bourliataux-Lajoinie

    (CNAM - Conservatoire National des Arts et Métiers [CNAM] - HESAM - HESAM Université - Communauté d'universités et d'établissements Hautes écoles Sorbonne Arts et métiers université, LIRSA - Laboratoire interdisciplinaire de recherche en sciences de l'action - CNAM - Conservatoire National des Arts et Métiers [CNAM] - HESAM - HESAM Université - Communauté d'universités et d'établissements Hautes écoles Sorbonne Arts et métiers université)

  • Thierry Lorey

    (Kedge BS - Kedge Business School)

  • Yann Rival

    (DRM - Dauphine Recherches en Management - Université Paris Dauphine-PSL - PSL - Université Paris Sciences et Lettres - CNRS - Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique)

Abstract

The motivations for walking the Camino have changed, but this element is not taken into account by public actors. Our research shows a gap between the expectations of the pilgrims and the public strategies. This gap is due to the fact that there is no formal tool to measure these expectations, which undermines the satisfaction of the experience and weakens the destination itself. To fill this gap, this article based on an empirical study (n= 399) proposes a five dimensional scale, validated in three languages. The implications of this work for public management are presented and discussed.

Suggested Citation

  • Frederic Dosquet & Stéphane Bourliataux-Lajoinie & Thierry Lorey & Yann Rival, 2023. "Expectativas de los peregrinos y estrategia de los actores públicos: el caso del Camino de Santiago," Post-Print hal-04132049, HAL.
    • Handle: RePEc:hal:journl:hal-04132049
    DOI: 10.3917/resg.156.0069
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    To our knowledge, this item is not available for download. To find whether it is available, there are three options:
    1. Check below whether another version of this item is available online.
    2. Check on the provider's web page whether it is in fact available.
    3. Perform a search for a similarly titled item that would be available.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:hal:journl:hal-04132049. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: CCSD (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.