IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/hal/journl/hal-04071465.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Corporate patriotism as a source of corporate reputation: a comparative multi-stakeholder approach

Author

Listed:
  • Petya Puncheva-Michelotti

    (ESC Rennes School of Business - ESC [Rennes] - ESC Rennes School of Business)

  • Rod Mccoll

    (ESC Rennes School of Business - ESC [Rennes] - ESC Rennes School of Business)

  • Andrea Vocino

    (Deakin University [Burwood])

  • Marco Michelotti

    (ESC Rennes School of Business - ESC [Rennes] - ESC Rennes School of Business)

Abstract

This paper aims to define the concept of corporate patriotism and clarify its relationship with corporate reputation in the context of multi-stakeholder engagements. It develops a scale to measure corporate patriotism. It then determines the relative importance of corporate patriotism to the perceptions of corporate reputation in four key stakeholder relationships – consumer, purchasing, employment, individual share investment and community relationships. Our research evidence shows that the stakeholder relationship context moderates the role of corporate patriotism as a dimension of corporate reputation. The results further show significant differences in the role of national identity in organisation–stakeholder relationships. Specifically, corporate patriotism is more important for the reputation of a company as an employer and local citizen than as a provider of products and services. Marketing managers should consider the reputational advantage stemming from corporate patriotism in the design of multi-stakeholder corporate communication strategies.

Suggested Citation

  • Petya Puncheva-Michelotti & Rod Mccoll & Andrea Vocino & Marco Michelotti, 2014. "Corporate patriotism as a source of corporate reputation: a comparative multi-stakeholder approach," Post-Print hal-04071465, HAL.
  • Handle: RePEc:hal:journl:hal-04071465
    DOI: 10.1080/0965254X.2014.885989
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    To our knowledge, this item is not available for download. To find whether it is available, there are three options:
    1. Check below whether another version of this item is available online.
    2. Check on the provider's web page whether it is in fact available.
    3. Perform a search for a similarly titled item that would be available.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:hal:journl:hal-04071465. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: CCSD (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.