IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/hal/journl/hal-03975818.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Towards a capacitating instrumentation of digital platforms. A case study of Airbnb Experience

Author

Listed:
  • Sophia Galiere

    (GREDEG - Groupe de Recherche en Droit, Economie et Gestion - UNS - Université Nice Sophia Antipolis (1965 - 2019) - CNRS - Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique - UniCA - Université Côte d'Azur, UniCA - Université Côte d'Azur)

Abstract

Can the management instrumentation of digital platforms be capacitating and reconcile performance with worker development? If so, what are its characteristics? These questions present many challenges. Indeed, digital work platforms are generally seen as incapacitating, whether they discipline behavior through increased algorithmic control or generate anomie situations by massively resorting to market coordination mechanisms. In order to question these limits and to propose a third way that identifies the characteristics of a platform capacitating instrumentation, we conducted a qualitative case study of the Airbnb Experience platform. Our results highlight the importance of subsidiarity, interrelated with the principles of flexibility and internal transparency, as a distinctive characteristic of ‘open' management instruments that constitute capacitating environments. The principle of subsidiarity implies the implementation of optional assistance and backup tools, which counterbalance algorithmic management systems and mitigate the risks of anomie on platforms that primarily rely on market mechanisms.

Suggested Citation

  • Sophia Galiere, 2021. "Towards a capacitating instrumentation of digital platforms. A case study of Airbnb Experience," Post-Print hal-03975818, HAL.
  • Handle: RePEc:hal:journl:hal-03975818
    DOI: 10.3917/rimhe.043.0027a
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    To our knowledge, this item is not available for download. To find whether it is available, there are three options:
    1. Check below whether another version of this item is available online.
    2. Check on the provider's web page whether it is in fact available.
    3. Perform a search for a similarly titled item that would be available.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:hal:journl:hal-03975818. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: CCSD (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.