IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/hal/journl/hal-03971194.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

The painful legitimation process of a new identity in a professional service firm
[Le processus douloureux de légitimation d’une nouvelle identité dans une entreprise de services professionnels]

Author

Listed:
  • Caroline Mothe

    (IREGE - Institut de Recherche en Gestion et en Economie - USMB [Université de Savoie] [Université de Chambéry] - Université Savoie Mont Blanc)

  • Emmanuel Mastio

    (UTS - University of Technology Sydney)

Abstract

To make an aspirational new organizational identity concrete, professional service firms (PSFs) must find ways to legitimate their new offerings. Using an inductive, longitudinal case study of an Australian intellectual property firm that aspires to become a strategic service provider, this study reveals that constructing a new identity forces the organization to engage in targeted, nuanced legitimating activities toward stakeholders, including both clients and the patent attorneys who are its owners and managing directors. The results establish a clear description of legitimacy dynamics and the interrelations of legitimacy and identity issues; provide evidence that organizational members can constrain professional organizations' efforts to make an aspirational identity concrete; and demonstrate theoretically that professional and individual legitimacies can link organizational identity aspirations with external legitimacy.

Suggested Citation

  • Caroline Mothe & Emmanuel Mastio, 2022. "The painful legitimation process of a new identity in a professional service firm [Le processus douloureux de légitimation d’une nouvelle identité dans une entreprise de services professionnels]," Post-Print hal-03971194, HAL.
  • Handle: RePEc:hal:journl:hal-03971194
    DOI: 10.3917/g2000.392.0019
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    To our knowledge, this item is not available for download. To find whether it is available, there are three options:
    1. Check below whether another version of this item is available online.
    2. Check on the provider's web page whether it is in fact available.
    3. Perform a search for a similarly titled item that would be available.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:hal:journl:hal-03971194. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: CCSD (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.