IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/hal/journl/hal-03770869.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Universities and patent trolls: An empirical study of university patent infringement litigation in the United States

Author

Listed:
  • G.S. Ascione
  • Laura Ciucci

    (GREThA - Groupe de Recherche en Economie Théorique et Appliquée - UB - Université de Bordeaux - CNRS - Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique)

  • C. Detotto
  • Valerio Sterzi

    (GREThA - Groupe de Recherche en Economie Théorique et Appliquée - UB - Université de Bordeaux - CNRS - Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique)

Abstract

Universities underwent a radical change of paradigm in the last forty years. Since Bayh-Dole Act in 1980, they have been accused of having a growing interest in revenue generation activities such as overzealous patenting, participation in patent auctions and morally doubtful patent enforcement. On the point, some prominent scholars argue that the litigation behavior of universities should be monitored, considering the possible similarity with the so- called patent trolls. Patent trolls are a kind of non-practicing entities (NPEs) whose core business is litigate patents with lower quality almost at the end of their life, trying to maximize their revenues at the expense of the potential plaintiffs. While the harms to innovation made by patent trolls are well-known, the involvement of universities in litigation has not been explored by the literature from an empirically point of view. In this work, we collect data on patents held by universities at the United States and Trademark Office (USPTO) and data on infringement lawsuits filed by universities in the years 1990-2019 to study the characteristics of the litigated patents. We find that universities litigate their patents only sporadically (less than 0.4% of their patents have been used in infringement proceedings) and when the patents are particularly valuable. Moreover, we analyse the fields in which universities litigate, considering that trolls mainly ravage in the ICT sector. Our conclusion supports the idea that universities participating in litigation is a growing phenomenon which should be monitored, but their current behavior does not reflect the strategies of the litigation NPEs. Further research is needed to consider the whole universities' portfolio to assess which patents they choose to litigate and the evolution of their strategies over time. © 2021 18th International Conference on Scientometrics and Informetrics, ISSI 2021. All rights reserved.

Suggested Citation

  • G.S. Ascione & Laura Ciucci & C. Detotto & Valerio Sterzi, 2021. "Universities and patent trolls: An empirical study of university patent infringement litigation in the United States," Post-Print hal-03770869, HAL.
  • Handle: RePEc:hal:journl:hal-03770869
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    To our knowledge, this item is not available for download. To find whether it is available, there are three options:
    1. Check below whether another version of this item is available online.
    2. Check on the provider's web page whether it is in fact available.
    3. Perform a search for a similarly titled item that would be available.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Valerio STERZI & Cécilia MARONERO & Gianluca ORSATTI & Andrea VEZZULLI, 2021. "Non-Practicing Entities in Europe: an Empirical Analysis of Patent Acquisitions at the European Patent Office," Bordeaux Economics Working Papers 2021-23, Bordeaux School of Economics (BSE).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:hal:journl:hal-03770869. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: CCSD (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.