IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/hal/journl/hal-03763717.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Can Nudges Promote Professional Skepticism in Audits?

Author

Listed:
  • Jean-François Gajewski

    (Laboratoire de Recherche Magellan - UJML - Université Jean Moulin - Lyon 3 - Université de Lyon - Institut d'Administration des Entreprises (IAE) - Lyon)

  • Pierre-Majorique Léger

    (HEC Montréal - HEC Montréal)

  • Marco Heimann

    (Laboratoire de Recherche Magellan - UJML - Université Jean Moulin - Lyon 3 - Université de Lyon - Institut d'Administration des Entreprises (IAE) - Lyon)

  • Prince Teye

    (Laboratoire de Recherche Magellan - UJML - Université Jean Moulin - Lyon 3 - Université de Lyon - Institut d'Administration des Entreprises (IAE) - Lyon)

Abstract

The effectiveness of nudges is widely acknowledged in behavioral sciences, though less is known about their usefulness and applicability in accounting or auditing contexts. By contextualizing nudge theory in financial audit settings, this article offers experimental verification of the effects of social norms and justification nudges on audit behavior. Two between-subject experiments (2 social norms x 2 justification) indicate positive effects of nudges on professional skepticism, which provides a marker of audit quality. Then an eye-tracking experiment, conducted during an audit task, helps clarify the cognitive mechanism at play. Specifically, nudged conditions are associated with greater visual attention during assessments of audit evidence. Combined findings thus suggest that nudges are effective at increasing auditors' visual attention to relevant information, which in turn raises professional skepticism in assessments of audit evidence.

Suggested Citation

  • Jean-François Gajewski & Pierre-Majorique Léger & Marco Heimann & Prince Teye, 2022. "Can Nudges Promote Professional Skepticism in Audits?," Post-Print hal-03763717, HAL.
    • Handle: RePEc:hal:journl:hal-03763717
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    To our knowledge, this item is not available for download. To find whether it is available, there are three options:
    1. Check below whether another version of this item is available online.
    2. Check on the provider's web page whether it is in fact available.
    3. Perform a search for a similarly titled item that would be available.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:hal:journl:hal-03763717. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: CCSD (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.