IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/hal/journl/hal-03735694.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Teaching engineering students how to design a Proof-Of-Concept: a way to experience the value of reflexive practices for engineers ?

Author

Listed:
  • Maxime Thomas

    (CGS i3 - Centre de Gestion Scientifique i3 - Mines Paris - PSL (École nationale supérieure des mines de Paris) - PSL - Université Paris Sciences et Lettres - I3 - Institut interdisciplinaire de l’innovation - CNRS - Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique)

  • Mariam Lafkihi

    (CGS i3 - Centre de Gestion Scientifique i3 - Mines Paris - PSL (École nationale supérieure des mines de Paris) - PSL - Université Paris Sciences et Lettres - I3 - Institut interdisciplinaire de l’innovation - CNRS - Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique)

  • Caroline Jobin

    (CGS i3 - Centre de Gestion Scientifique i3 - Mines Paris - PSL (École nationale supérieure des mines de Paris) - PSL - Université Paris Sciences et Lettres - I3 - Institut interdisciplinaire de l’innovation - CNRS - Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique)

  • Eric Ballot

    (CGS i3 - Centre de Gestion Scientifique i3 - Mines Paris - PSL (École nationale supérieure des mines de Paris) - PSL - Université Paris Sciences et Lettres - I3 - Institut interdisciplinaire de l’innovation - CNRS - Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique)

  • Pascal Le Masson

    (CGS i3 - Centre de Gestion Scientifique i3 - Mines Paris - PSL (École nationale supérieure des mines de Paris) - PSL - Université Paris Sciences et Lettres - I3 - Institut interdisciplinaire de l’innovation - CNRS - Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique)

  • Benoit Weil

    (CGS i3 - Centre de Gestion Scientifique i3 - Mines Paris - PSL (École nationale supérieure des mines de Paris) - PSL - Université Paris Sciences et Lettres - I3 - Institut interdisciplinaire de l’innovation - CNRS - Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique)

Abstract

Industrial companies expect engineers to take an external and critical look at their activities through reflexive practices. Recognising the criticality of reflexivity, Project Based Learning approaches include assignments for students to implement reflexive approaches on their projects. However, it remains unclear in the literature whether those assignments help the students experience the value of reflexive practices or if students consider them as academic exercises. In this concept paper, we present a new teaching module that intends to make students experience the value of reflexive practices for engineers. In this module, an industrial partner asks a group of master engineering students to design and implement a Proof-of-Concept (POC) to help the company explore an innovation field. This eight-week project is mainly conducted within the company. Teachers act both as coaches through regular meetings and as experts through lectures focusing on specific engineering reasoning (statistics, modelling, simulation, design of experiments…) that are necessary to design a robust POC. At the end of the module, students present conclusions drawn from their POC to the company which explain to students the next steps envisioned from their contribution. The module is two years old : so far, the authors supervised twelve students split into four industrial projects. Feedback for both companies and students were collected, as well as the lectures and the final presentations. Based on these, we conducted a preliminary analysis that suggests that students experience the value of reflexive practices for engineering work during the module.

Suggested Citation

  • Maxime Thomas & Mariam Lafkihi & Caroline Jobin & Eric Ballot & Pascal Le Masson & Benoit Weil, 2022. "Teaching engineering students how to design a Proof-Of-Concept: a way to experience the value of reflexive practices for engineers ?," Post-Print hal-03735694, HAL.
  • Handle: RePEc:hal:journl:hal-03735694
    Note: View the original document on HAL open archive server: https://hal.science/hal-03735694
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://hal.science/hal-03735694/document
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:hal:journl:hal-03735694. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: CCSD (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.