IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/hal/journl/hal-03701822.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Entre sécurité des soins et injonctions à la performance économique au bloc opératoire : faut-il choisir ?

Author

Listed:
  • Stéphanie Gentil

    (LEMNA - Laboratoire d'économie et de management de Nantes Atlantique - IEMN-IAE Nantes - Institut d'Économie et de Management de Nantes - Institut d'Administration des Entreprises - Nantes - UN - Université de Nantes)

Abstract

In a context where health care facilities are encouraged to control their costs, while responding to safety stakes, the article questions how these two types of performance can complement one another. The article proposes to revisit the work on "high reliability organizations" (HRO), adopting a managerial approach through the study of organizational arrangements, rarely addressed in its current form in these research stream [Lorino, 2005; Brabet, 2005]. The empirical study of two operating rooms examine the principles highlighted by HRO's authors, in the context of economic rationalization. It reveals that the organizational arrangements developed in order to improve economic performance can also play an important role in patient safety. However, the complementarity between efficiency and safety is based on the collective work of caregivers who adapt tools or devices when they deal with unexpected events. The occurrence of unexpected events requires managing these performance as closely as possible to the activity. This result calls for directions to open the "black box" and not only focusing on the structuring work done upstream part of action, but also considering and facilitating the organizational work actually performed by caregivers.

Suggested Citation

  • Stéphanie Gentil, 2016. "Entre sécurité des soins et injonctions à la performance économique au bloc opératoire : faut-il choisir ?," Post-Print hal-03701822, HAL.
  • Handle: RePEc:hal:journl:hal-03701822
    DOI: 10.3917/jgem.165.0291
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    To our knowledge, this item is not available for download. To find whether it is available, there are three options:
    1. Check below whether another version of this item is available online.
    2. Check on the provider's web page whether it is in fact available.
    3. Perform a search for a similarly titled item that would be available.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:hal:journl:hal-03701822. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: CCSD (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.