IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/hal/journl/hal-03641801.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Innovation Capacity of City Administrations: A Best Practices Approach

Author

Listed:
  • Vincent Boly

    (ERPI - Equipe de Recherche sur les Processus Innovatifs - UL - Université de Lorraine)

  • Manon Enjolras

    (ERPI - Equipe de Recherche sur les Processus Innovatifs - UL - Université de Lorraine)

  • Severine Husson
  • Laure Morel

    (ERPI - Equipe de Recherche sur les Processus Innovatifs - UL - Université de Lorraine)

  • Laurent Dupont

    (ERPI - Equipe de Recherche sur les Processus Innovatifs - UL - Université de Lorraine)

  • Lina Benis

Abstract

Despite the fact that the transformation of the public sector has been underway for several years, public sector innovation remains a concept that is debated both within the scientific community and among practitioners. Even if evaluating innovation processes is a major concern for academics and companies, monitoring the innovation process through a formalized evaluation is relatively new in the public sector. The determinants of innovation are studied in depth in the literature but the link between these concepts and empirical observations still need further investigation to explain the evaluation processes of innovation management at the local level (city administration). This paper provides some insights into this gap by proposing an innovation capability evaluation framework that relies on best practices. This framework is based on an innovation metric initially dedicated to companies. It has been adapted to the city administration, combining a systematic literature review and an empirical co-construction approach with practitioners from the city of Nancy (France).

Suggested Citation

  • Vincent Boly & Manon Enjolras & Severine Husson & Laure Morel & Laurent Dupont & Lina Benis, 2021. "Innovation Capacity of City Administrations: A Best Practices Approach," Post-Print hal-03641801, HAL.
  • Handle: RePEc:hal:journl:hal-03641801
    DOI: 10.3917/jie.pr1.0121
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    To our knowledge, this item is not available for download. To find whether it is available, there are three options:
    1. Check below whether another version of this item is available online.
    2. Check on the provider's web page whether it is in fact available.
    3. Perform a search for a similarly titled item that would be available.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:hal:journl:hal-03641801. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: CCSD (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.