IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/hal/journl/hal-03607779.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Améliorer l’impartialité de l’expertise scientifique : l’incertitude, l’expertise scientifique et le politique

Author

Listed:
  • Thomas Boyer-Kassem

    (MAPP [Poitiers] - Métaphysique allemande et philosophie pratique - UP - Université de Poitiers = University of Poitiers, Axe 1 (2022-2027) : "Vulnérabilités et risques" (MSHS Poitiers) - MSHS de Poitiers - Maison des sciences de l'homme et de la société de Poitiers [UAR 3565] - UP - Université de Poitiers = University of Poitiers - CNRS - Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique)

  • Sébastien Duchêne

    (CEE-M - Centre d'Economie de l'Environnement - Montpellier - CNRS - Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique - INRAE - Institut National de Recherche pour l’Agriculture, l’Alimentation et l’Environnement - Institut Agro Montpellier - Institut Agro - Institut national d'enseignement supérieur pour l'agriculture, l'alimentation et l'environnement - UM - Université de Montpellier)

  • Julie Jebeile

    (UNIBE - Universität Bern / University of Bern)

Abstract

Thomas Boyer-Kassem, Sébastien Duchêne et Julie Jebeile étudient les groupes d'experts scientifiques tel le conseil scientifique Covid 19 qui conseillent des décideurs politiques en contexte d'incertitude. Quel rôle ces experts devraient-ils avoir en principe dans la décision politique finale et comment, en pratique peuvent-ils assurer ce rôle ? Les auteurs proposent cinq recommandations pratiques pour que le rôle des experts se rapproche d'une certaine impartialité..

Suggested Citation

  • Thomas Boyer-Kassem & Sébastien Duchêne & Julie Jebeile, 2022. "Améliorer l’impartialité de l’expertise scientifique : l’incertitude, l’expertise scientifique et le politique," Post-Print hal-03607779, HAL.
    • Handle: RePEc:hal:journl:hal-03607779
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    To our knowledge, this item is not available for download. To find whether it is available, there are three options:
    1. Check below whether another version of this item is available online.
    2. Check on the provider's web page whether it is in fact available.
    3. Perform a search for a similarly titled item that would be available.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:hal:journl:hal-03607779. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: CCSD (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.