IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/hal/journl/hal-03533118.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Multisided Markets and Platform Dominance

Author

Listed:
  • Edmond Baranes

    (MRE - Montpellier Recherche en Economie - UM - Université de Montpellier)

  • James Alleman

    (University of Colorado [Boulder])

  • Paul Rappoport

    (Temple University [Philadelphia] - Pennsylvania Commonwealth System of Higher Education (PCSHE))

Abstract

Facebook and Google and other internet giants are multisided markets (MSM). The user-side of the market, prices are zero—"free." On the other side of the market, Facebook's and Google's revenues are derived from advertising which appears when the users click on advertisers' web sites. They can extract exorbitant prices for ads, since they are the only source that can target ads directly to potential customers with laser-like focus to produce enormous monopoly rents. This monopolistic aspect of the internet giants is addressed in the Chapter. Monopoly pricing is not well defined in multisided markets. The paper examines non-transactional multisided markets for their ability to create consumers' harm. Estimates of Google's and Facebook's social cost in terms of consumers' welfare loss are $54 and $33 billion, respectively, for a total cost of at least 87 billion dollars. The dominant internet platforms can create three major harms to consumers: Increasing prices to consumers via added costs to the products being advertised,Elimination (or non-emergence) of competition in markets to the products being advertised,Increasing prices to consumers beyond the cost of advertising via the market power of the remaining firms in the market of the products being advertised.

Suggested Citation

  • Edmond Baranes & James Alleman & Paul Rappoport, 2022. "Multisided Markets and Platform Dominance," Post-Print hal-03533118, HAL.
  • Handle: RePEc:hal:journl:hal-03533118
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    To our knowledge, this item is not available for download. To find whether it is available, there are three options:
    1. Check below whether another version of this item is available online.
    2. Check on the provider's web page whether it is in fact available.
    3. Perform a search for a similarly titled item that would be available.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:hal:journl:hal-03533118. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: CCSD (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.