IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/hal/journl/hal-03519904.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

‘You are free to choose . . . are you?’ Organisational punishment as a productivity incentive in the social science literature

Author

Listed:
  • Tom Mcnamara

    (ESC [Rennes] - ESC Rennes School of Business)

  • Debrah Meloso

    (TBS - Toulouse Business School)

  • Marco Michelotti

    (ESC [Rennes] - ESC Rennes School of Business)

  • Petya Puncheva-Michelotti

    (ESC [Rennes] - ESC Rennes School of Business)

Abstract

This article investigates the theoretical and empirical relationships between organisational punishment and productivity. We do so by highlighting the contributions of two academic fields to this topic: management and economics. We underscore the many common theoretical and empirical grounds across management and economics. We heighten, in particular, how motivation and learning theories have contributed to the development of both theoretical and empirical research on this topic. This article also argues that this debate could be significantly advanced if insights stemming from industrial relations and labour process theory were also considered, as these disciplines have traditionally focused on macro-issues such as how changes in the economic/institutional contexts may affect the likelihood that organisations will resort to punishment. In order to foster future research on this topic, three research themes were developed: (a) freedom of choice and the role of contract completeness; (b) perception of punishment, monitoring and productivity; and (c) punishment, productivity and exogenous variables.

Suggested Citation

  • Tom Mcnamara & Debrah Meloso & Marco Michelotti & Petya Puncheva-Michelotti, 2022. "‘You are free to choose . . . are you?’ Organisational punishment as a productivity incentive in the social science literature," Post-Print hal-03519904, HAL.
  • Handle: RePEc:hal:journl:hal-03519904
    DOI: 10.1177/00187267211007891
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    To our knowledge, this item is not available for download. To find whether it is available, there are three options:
    1. Check below whether another version of this item is available online.
    2. Check on the provider's web page whether it is in fact available.
    3. Perform a search for a similarly titled item that would be available.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:hal:journl:hal-03519904. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: CCSD (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.