IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/hal/journl/hal-03295878.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Contrasting processing tomato cultivars unlink yield and pollen viability under heat stress

Author

Listed:
  • Golan Miller

    (Institute of Plant Sciences - Agricultural Research Organization - the Volcani Center)

  • Avital Beery

    (Institute of Plant Sciences - Agricultural Research Organization - the Volcani Center)

  • Prashant Kumar Singh

    (Institute of Plant Sciences - Agricultural Research Organization - the Volcani Center, Department of Biotechnology - Mizoram University)

  • Fengde Wang

    (Institute of Plant Sciences - Agricultural Research Organization - the Volcani Center, Institute of vegetables and flowers - SAAS - Shandong Academy of Agricultural Sciences)

  • Rotem Zelingher

    (Institute of Plant Sciences - Agricultural Research Organization - the Volcani Center, ECO-PUB - Economie Publique - AgroParisTech - Université Paris-Saclay - INRAE - Institut National de Recherche pour l’Agriculture, l’Alimentation et l’Environnement)

  • Etel Motenko

    (Institute of Plant Sciences - Agricultural Research Organization - the Volcani Center)

  • Michal Lieberman-Lazarovich

    (Institute of Plant Sciences - Agricultural Research Organization - the Volcani Center)

Abstract

Climate change is causing temperature increment in crop production areas worldwide, generating conditions of heat stress that negatively affect crop productivity. Tomato (Solanum lycopersicum), a major vegetable crop, is highly susceptible to conditions of heat stress. When tomato plants are exposed to ambient day/night temperatures that exceed 32°C/20°C respectively during the reproductive phase, fruit set and fruit weight are reduced, leading to a significant decrease in yield. Processing tomato cultivars are cultivated in open fields, where environmental conditions are not controlled, therefore plants are exposed to multiple abiotic stresses, including heat stress. Nonetheless, information on stress response in processing tomatoes is very limited. Understanding the physiological response of modern processing tomato cultivars to heat stress may facilitate the development of thermotolerant cultivars. Here, we compared two tomato processing cultivars, H4107 and H9780, that we found to be constantly differing in yield performance. Using field and temperature-controlled greenhouse experiments, we show that the observed difference in yield is attributed to the occurrence of heat stress conditions. In addition, fruit-set and seed production were significantly higher in the thermotolerant cultivar H4107, compared with H9780. Despite the general acceptance of pollen viability as a measure of thermotolerance, there was no difference in the percentage of viable pollen between H4107 and H9780 under either of the conditions tested. In addition to observations of similar pollen germination and bud abscission rates, our results suggest that processing tomato cultivars may present a particular case, in which pollen performance is not determining reproductive thermotolerance. Our results also demonstrate the value of combining controlled and uncontrolled experimental settings, in order to validate and identify heat stress related responses, thus facilitating the development of thermotolerant processing tomato cultivars.

Suggested Citation

  • Golan Miller & Avital Beery & Prashant Kumar Singh & Fengde Wang & Rotem Zelingher & Etel Motenko & Michal Lieberman-Lazarovich, 2021. "Contrasting processing tomato cultivars unlink yield and pollen viability under heat stress," Post-Print hal-03295878, HAL.
  • Handle: RePEc:hal:journl:hal-03295878
    DOI: 10.1093/aobpla/plab046
    Note: View the original document on HAL open archive server: https://hal.inrae.fr/hal-03295878
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://hal.inrae.fr/hal-03295878/document
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1093/aobpla/plab046?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:hal:journl:hal-03295878. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: CCSD (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.