IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/hal/journl/hal-03188244.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

The Institutionalization of Political Risk Assessment by Chinese Multinational Firms

Author

Listed:
  • Ilan Alon

    (UIA - University of Agder)

  • Alfredo Jiménez

    (Kedge BS - Kedge Business School)

  • Hui Liu

    (ITESM - Tecnológico de Monterrey = Monterrey Institute of Technology)

  • Hua Wang

    (EM - EMLyon Business School)

Abstract

Some researchers have claimed that Chinese firms are impervious to political risk, call­ing into question the institutionalization of political risk by Chinese firms. Building on resource dependence theory and the literature on non-market strategies, this study finds significant impact by ownership structure, firm scale, and the degree of internationaliz­ation on the institutionalization of political risk assessments (IPRA) by Chinese firms. As such, state-owned firms and larger firms cultivate a higher level of IPRA. We find a positive impact of a firm's scale and scope of internationalization, but insignificant impact of depth of internationalization.L'institutionnalisation de l'évaluation des risques politiques par les entreprises multinationales chinoises. Il est affirmé que les entreprises chinoises étaient insensibles au risque politique, remet­tant en question l'institutionnalisation du risque politique par les entreprises chinoises. S'appuyant sur la théorie de la dépendance des ressources et la littérature sur les stratégies non marchandes, cette étude révèle un impact significatif de la structure de propriété, la taille et le degré d'internationalisation sur l'insti­tutionnalisation des évaluations du risque politique (IPRA). Les entreprises publiques et les grandes entreprises cultivent un niveau plus élevé d'IPRA. Nous constatons un impact positif de la taille et de l'étendue de l'inter­nationalisation, mais un impact insignifiant de la profondeur de l'internationalisation.La institucionalización de la evaluación del riesgo político por las empresas multinacionales chinas. Se ha afirmado que las empresas chinas son inmunes al riesgo político, cuestionando la institucionalización del riesgo político por parte de las empresas chinas. Partiendo de la teoría de la dependencia de recursos y la literatura sobre estrategias no de mercado, encontramos que la estructura de propiedad, el tamaño y el grado de internacionalización influyen en la institucionalización de las eva­luaciones de riesgo político (IPRA). Así, las empresas estatales y las grandes tienen mayor nivel de IPRA. Encontramos un impacto positivo de la escala y el alcance de la interna­cionalización, pero un impacto insignificante de la profundidad de la internacionalización.

Suggested Citation

  • Ilan Alon & Alfredo Jiménez & Hui Liu & Hua Wang, 2020. "The Institutionalization of Political Risk Assessment by Chinese Multinational Firms," Post-Print hal-03188244, HAL.
  • Handle: RePEc:hal:journl:hal-03188244
    DOI: 10.7202/1077433ar
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    To our knowledge, this item is not available for download. To find whether it is available, there are three options:
    1. Check below whether another version of this item is available online.
    2. Check on the provider's web page whether it is in fact available.
    3. Perform a search for a similarly titled item that would be available.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:hal:journl:hal-03188244. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: CCSD (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.