IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/hal/journl/hal-03029634.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Profit Vs. Not-for-Profit: Logistics Service Providers (LSP) and Humanitarian relief

Author

Listed:
  • Diego Vega

    (Hanken School of Economics, HUMLOG Institute - Hanken School of Economics)

  • Christine Roussat

    (IUT d'Allier - IUT d'Allier - UCA [2017-2020] - Université Clermont Auvergne [2017-2020], CRET-LOG - Centre de Recherche sur le Transport et la Logistique - AMU - Aix Marseille Université)

  • Nathalie Fabbe-Costes

    (CRET-LOG - Centre de Recherche sur le Transport et la Logistique - AMU - Aix Marseille Université)

Abstract

Purpose: Logistics outsourcing recently spread to humanitarian supply chains. Academics thus began to explore the emergence of LSPs in the field: commercial or humanitarian organizations (HOs). Authors point out that outsourcing improves the delivery of goods, the logistics capabilities of HOs, while reducing risks. However, previous works failed to distinguish Not-for-Profit from commercial contracts in humanitarian logistics. Our research seeks to refine and expand the role that LSPs play in humanitarian supply chains based on Vega and Roussat's (2015) conceptualization and further Sigala and Wakolbinger's (2019) partial validation. Research Approach: Our exploratory research is a qualitative endeavor, following abductive reasoning process and using a ‘systematic combining' approach. Based on an interview guide built upon an extensive literature review, we conducted interviews with LSP identified as major players in humanitarian relief among which Kuehne + Nagel, DHL, Agility, Damco. For each company, we interviewed a contract manager or the head of Aid SBU (when it exists) and the CSR manager. The interviews were transcribed and coded using a QDAS (NVivo) in order to ensure internal validity. Findings and Originality: First results reveal a huge diversity of situations. The prices for logistics services can go from usual commercial tariffs to pre-fixed rates negotiated on a periodic basis. Some firms use open book policies, propose price reductions or finally provide services pro-bono. The research also identifies levers justifying the choice of the pricing politics. Surprisingly, humanitarian logistics is clearly considered as a business unit, independent of CSR commitments Research Impact: Our research contributes to the growing trend of research on humanitarian logistics as a service. Focusing on the characteristics of the relation between LSPs and HOs helps to clarify the public-private relationships and the conditions of service providing, thus completing recent works. Practical Impact: Results can help HOs understanding LSPs' decision process and both partners better grasping the other's mindset.

Suggested Citation

  • Diego Vega & Christine Roussat & Nathalie Fabbe-Costes, 2020. "Profit Vs. Not-for-Profit: Logistics Service Providers (LSP) and Humanitarian relief," Post-Print hal-03029634, HAL.
  • Handle: RePEc:hal:journl:hal-03029634
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    To our knowledge, this item is not available for download. To find whether it is available, there are three options:
    1. Check below whether another version of this item is available online.
    2. Check on the provider's web page whether it is in fact available.
    3. Perform a search for a similarly titled item that would be available.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:hal:journl:hal-03029634. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: CCSD (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.