IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/hal/journl/hal-03025202.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Une analyse régionale comparative de la géographie de l'innovation : le cas des Sfic en France et au Canada

Author

Listed:
  • Christophe Carrincazeaux

    (GREThA - Groupe de Recherche en Economie Théorique et Appliquée - UB - Université de Bordeaux - CNRS - Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique)

  • David Doloreux
  • Richard Shearmur

    (INRS - Institut National de la Recherche Scientifique [Québec])

Abstract

L'objectif de cet article est d'analyser les comportements d'innovation et d'expliquer les variations géographiques des stratégies d'innovation des entreprises de Services à Forte Intensité de Connaissance (Sfic) dans les régions en France et au Canada (Québec). Les résultats empiriques font émerger des similarités de part et d'autres de l'Atlantique, mais aussi une différence importante : les stratégies d'innovation, pourtant assez semblables dans les deux pays, se déploient dans des types de régions différents. Ces résultats exploratoires soulèvent des questions quant à la transférabilité des concepts associant géographie et innovation, et mettent en exergue à la fois la difficulté et la nécessité d'effectuer plus d'études strictement comparables (mêmes concepts, mêmes méthodes, mêmes données) entre contextes nationaux et continentaux différents. ; The objective of this article is to analyze the innovation behaviors of Knowledge-Intensive Business Services (Kibs) in France and Canada (Québec) and to describe the geographic variation of innovation strategies across regions. The empirical results reveal similarities in strategies on both sides of the Atlantic, but also an important difference: innovation strategies, though similar in both countries, are deployed in different types of regions. These exploratory results raise many questions about the transferability of concepts related to the geography of innovation, and highlight both the difficulty of, and need for, studies that are strictly comparable (same concepts, same methods, same data) across different national and continental contexts.

Suggested Citation

  • Christophe Carrincazeaux & David Doloreux & Richard Shearmur, 2016. "Une analyse régionale comparative de la géographie de l'innovation : le cas des Sfic en France et au Canada," Post-Print hal-03025202, HAL.
  • Handle: RePEc:hal:journl:hal-03025202
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    To our knowledge, this item is not available for download. To find whether it is available, there are three options:
    1. Check below whether another version of this item is available online.
    2. Check on the provider's web page whether it is in fact available.
    3. Perform a search for a similarly titled item that would be available.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:hal:journl:hal-03025202. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: CCSD (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.