IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/hal/journl/hal-02737250.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Economic, social and environmental impact of Alltech FEI World Equestrian Games™ 2014 in Normandy

Author

Listed:
  • Celine Vial

    (UMR MOISA - Marchés, Organisations, Institutions et Stratégies d'Acteurs - Cirad - Centre de Coopération Internationale en Recherche Agronomique pour le Développement - INRA - Institut National de la Recherche Agronomique - Montpellier SupAgro - Centre international d'études supérieures en sciences agronomiques - CIHEAM-IAMM - Centre International de Hautes Etudes Agronomiques Méditerranéennes - Institut Agronomique Méditerranéen de Montpellier - CIHEAM - Centre International de Hautes Études Agronomiques Méditerranéennes - Montpellier SupAgro - Institut national d’études supérieures agronomiques de Montpellier, Pôle développement innovation et recherche - Institut Français du Cheval et de l'Equitation)

  • Eric Barget

    (CDES - Centre de Droit et d'Economie du Sport - UNILIM - Université de Limoges)

Abstract

In 2014, France hosted the World Equestrian Games in Normandy. As part of a collaborative research program carried out by IFCE (French Institute for Horse and Riding), INRA (National Institute of Agronomic Research), and Limoges CDES (Sports Economics and Law Centre), an impact study of the event and its associated Territorial Project was conducted. This is one of the few studies, which measures the economic, social and environmental impacts of an event of this scale. These three approaches are complementary, appreciating changes in the level of economic activity, people's well-being, and state of the environment. To this aim, a methodology has gradually been built and tested during previous years on various small size equestrian sporting events. It combines quantitative and qualitative approaches, pushing the classical limits of impact studies. The economic evaluation uses Base Theory and Keynesian multipliers. Social utility is addressed through the monetarization of use and non-use values of the event for spectators and inhabitants (thanks to the travel cost method and the contingent valuation method). This quantitative evaluation is completed by a qualitative analysis to describe the reasons why people give use and non-use values to this event. We studied the various items that affect the environment through their specific units and through an analysis of the organizers' efforts to minimize the impact of the event. We based the results on the collection of information from the Games organizers, field observations and around 2,300 surveys conducted during the event. The Alltech FEI World Equestrian Games™ 2014 in Normandy brought together 313,556 spectators and 1,060 participants. Their total economic impact amounts to 102 million euros for Normandy while the operating budget of the event was €82 million (including €40 million of public money). From a social point of view, the contributions of this event are mainly related to the pleasure of attending it or of hosing it and to its public good characteristics: economic and tourist benefits, media exposure, attractiveness of the local area, and encouragement of the development of the local and even national equine industry. The social utility of the 2014 WEG is estimated at 45 million euros. On the environmental aspect, our analysis highlights the numerous efforts of the organizers to aim towards the organization of an eco-responsible event. This study represents both a contribution to academic research and to the horse industry, participating in the methodological and theoretical advances in impact studies and in reflections on optimizing the benefits of equestrian events for the territories that host them.

Suggested Citation

  • Celine Vial & Eric Barget, 2018. "Economic, social and environmental impact of Alltech FEI World Equestrian Games™ 2014 in Normandy," Post-Print hal-02737250, HAL.
  • Handle: RePEc:hal:journl:hal-02737250
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    To our knowledge, this item is not available for download. To find whether it is available, there are three options:
    1. Check below whether another version of this item is available online.
    2. Check on the provider's web page whether it is in fact available.
    3. Perform a search for a similarly titled item that would be available.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:hal:journl:hal-02737250. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: CCSD (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.