IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/hal/journl/hal-02549474.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Home users blogs to test products : a field experimentation

Author

Listed:
  • Christine Balagué

    (UMR CNRS 8179 - Université de Lille, Sciences et Technologies - CNRS - Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique)

  • Kristine de Valck

    (HEC Paris - Ecole des Hautes Etudes Commerciales)

Abstract

This research examines how companies can best organize their virtual customer environments in order to elicit valuable consumer input in the New Product Development (NPD) process. Real developments in information technology nowadays offer firms new ways to elicit consumer input and feedback in the NPD process. Many firms are experimenting with these new opportunities, but little systematic, empirical research exists that allows managers to make informed decisions on when, where, and how to use what for whom. Our paper aims to make a contribution in understanding the effect of the design of interactions between consumers and between consumers and company on the value of the blog as a research tool . Our paper empirically investigates various design choices on the usefulness of blogs as platforms of interaction among consumers and between consumers and company in the NPD process. Through an experimentation, consumers are requested to participate in the NPD process as product testers. They use home blogs that allow the company to understand how consumers use the product, to identify potential adoption barriers, to define product strengths and weaknesses. Our protocols test the impact of two aspects of the virtual customer environment: the interaction between consumers and the interaction between consumers and company. We use both qualitative and quantitative metrics to analyze the results. This research is made in collaboration with Danone center of research.

Suggested Citation

  • Christine Balagué & Kristine de Valck, 2008. "Home users blogs to test products : a field experimentation," Post-Print hal-02549474, HAL.
  • Handle: RePEc:hal:journl:hal-02549474
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    To our knowledge, this item is not available for download. To find whether it is available, there are three options:
    1. Check below whether another version of this item is available online.
    2. Check on the provider's web page whether it is in fact available.
    3. Perform a search for a similarly titled item that would be available.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Innovation; Blog; Product test;
    All these keywords.

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:hal:journl:hal-02549474. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: CCSD (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.