Mitarbeiterschulung und jüngste Entwicklungen: Verantwortung des Bedieners, Mitverantwortung oder einfache Anordnung?[Employee training and recent developments: operator responsibility, co-responsibility or simple injunction?]

Encouraging employee empowerment becomes an important vector of what some HRDs refer to as "employee involved in their career development". Considered from the angle of the new individualized training devices (DIF, VAE, etc.) offered to production operators, the idea seems to gain consensus both for the State and for employers. The individual is empowered. This model of the employee "actor of his training" and co-responsible for his professional future is not without ambiguity. How can an individual determine the trades that will be promising in five or ten years, when the companies themselves have difficulty determining the evolution of jobs? Does the pressure exerted on individuals ("the less we know where we are going, the more we have to take care of ourselves") not lead to customs clearance for the company which nevertheless remains the heart of the acquisition of skills ? These changes also tend to reveal a very ambivalent individual, both interested in the skills approach and in overcoming the constraints of a statutory career, appreciating self-training while experiencing its cost.