IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/hal/journl/hal-02474331.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Crowdsourcing : la foule en question(s)

Author

Listed:
  • Sophie Renault

    (LOG - Laboratoire Orléanais de Gestion (1998-2011) - UO - Université d'Orléans, VALLOREM - Val de Loire Recherche en Management - UO - Université d'Orléans - UT - Université de Tours, IAE Caen - Institut d'Administration des Entreprises - Caen - UNICAEN - Université de Caen Normandie - NU - Normandie Université)

Abstract

Although at the heart of "crowdsourcing" the definition of the word "crowd" is prone to controversy. In its original meaning, the word "crowd" refers to a multitude of people gathered in one place. However, in the context of crowdsourcing this "place" is mostly virtual, we are here talking about the digital crowd. Therefore, many of the facets of what we call a crowd are called into question : does it consist of a large number of individuals ? Are they all in the same place ? Does this crowd produce good quality ? This article questions seven misconceptions surrounding the word "crowd" in order to better understand its morphology and contours.

Suggested Citation

  • Sophie Renault, 2017. "Crowdsourcing : la foule en question(s)," Post-Print hal-02474331, HAL.
    • Handle: RePEc:hal:journl:hal-02474331
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    To our knowledge, this item is not available for download. To find whether it is available, there are three options:
    1. Check below whether another version of this item is available online.
    2. Check on the provider's web page whether it is in fact available.
    3. Perform a search for a similarly titled item that would be available.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Isabelle Liotard & Valérie Revest, 2022. "Open innovation and prizes: is the European Commission really comitted?," CEPN Working Papers hal-03524203, HAL.
    2. Isabelle Liotard & Valérie Revest, 2022. "Open innovation and prizes: is the European Commission really comitted?," Working Papers hal-03524203, HAL.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:hal:journl:hal-02474331. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: CCSD (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.