IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/hal/journl/hal-02439292.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Appropriation process of dirty work: focus on health executives in a medical services restructuring

Author

Listed:
  • Jennifer Urasadettan

    (LIRIS - Laboratoire interdisciplinaire de recherche en innovations sociétales - UR2 - Université de Rennes 2)

  • Franck Burellier

    (UR - Université de Rennes)

Abstract

Purpose The literature related to the dirty work had been mobilized to explain how the changes in hospitals (technification and increasing complexification work in particular) affected the allocation of the function between the various corporation (physicians, nursing staff, administration), and contributed to make them evolve. The purpose of the paper is to better understand in a context of organizational change what is the process that allows individuals to appropriate the dirty work that one tries to delegate to them. Design/methodology/approach To deal with this issue, for a year and a half, the authors conducted a longitudinal case study based on the evolution of the organizational merger between to medical units in a French hospital. Findings Our results showed that the appropriation of dirty work first needs the acceptance of task shifting, then a phase to normalise dirty work through various tactics (reframing, refocusing, and team recognition). We also emphasised the essential role played by these activities to enhance collaboration between doctors and caregivers in their quest for restructuring and institutionalising change. Originality/value While the literature on dirty work focuses on the "how and why" the allocation of the function between the various corporation can evolve, this research investigates more in depth the working of the appropriation process itself. The issue of appropriation introduces a new element in the framework of dirty work and can constitute an interesting focus for managers looking toenhance organizational change.

Suggested Citation

  • Jennifer Urasadettan & Franck Burellier, 2017. "Appropriation process of dirty work: focus on health executives in a medical services restructuring," Post-Print hal-02439292, HAL.
  • Handle: RePEc:hal:journl:hal-02439292
    DOI: 10.1108/JOCM-07-2016-0127
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    To our knowledge, this item is not available for download. To find whether it is available, there are three options:
    1. Check below whether another version of this item is available online.
    2. Check on the provider's web page whether it is in fact available.
    3. Perform a search for a similarly titled item that would be available.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:hal:journl:hal-02439292. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: CCSD (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.