IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/hal/journl/hal-02376038.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Non-monetary costs and the interdependence of players in B2B multi-sided markets : a study into the adoption of a dematerialization platform

Author

Listed:
  • Patrick Loux

    (Métis Lab EM Normandie - EM Normandie - École de Management de Normandie)

  • Mathilde Aubry

    (Métis Lab EM Normandie - EM Normandie - École de Management de Normandie)

  • Sébastien Tran

    (PULV - Pôle Universitaire Léonard de Vinci)

  • Emmanuel Baudoin

    (IMT-BS - MMS - Département Management, Marketing et Stratégie - TEM - Télécom Ecole de Management - IMT - Institut Mines-Télécom [Paris] - IMT-BS - Institut Mines-Télécom Business School - IMT - Institut Mines-Télécom [Paris], LITEM - Laboratoire en Innovation, Technologies, Economie et Management (EA 7363) - UEVE - Université d'Évry-Val-d'Essonne - TEM - Télécom Ecole de Management)

Abstract

This paper explores the case of a dematerialisation platform for B2B transactions between construction industry firms and public contracting authorities. Different qualitative materials, including 28 semi-structured interviews, were gathered over a two-year period. Our findings highlight two main contributions to the existing literature on two-sided markets (or more generally multi-sided market). First, this paper reveals new boundary conditions within which the pricing policy of a platform provider loses its ability to coordinate and stimulate users' adoption behaviors. Under these specific circumstances, inter-organizational collaboration in the selection of a unique platform emerges as a key condition to produce cross-network externalities, and therefore as a major source of technological change in the area of a radical process innovation. Second, we show that the gains stemming from the adoption of a dematerialisation platform follow a non-linear path. Specifically, an increase in the volume of new users in one side of the market first reduces the utility of the platform for the other side of the market. Indeed, it causes the contracting parties to duplicate some transactions while incurring reorganization costs. As the number of users increases, the adoption path reaches a tipping point above which using a dematerialisation platform creates gains compared with using and exchanging paper documents.

Suggested Citation

  • Patrick Loux & Mathilde Aubry & Sébastien Tran & Emmanuel Baudoin, 2016. "Non-monetary costs and the interdependence of players in B2B multi-sided markets : a study into the adoption of a dematerialization platform," Post-Print hal-02376038, HAL.
  • Handle: RePEc:hal:journl:hal-02376038
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    To our knowledge, this item is not available for download. To find whether it is available, there are three options:
    1. Check below whether another version of this item is available online.
    2. Check on the provider's web page whether it is in fact available.
    3. Perform a search for a similarly titled item that would be available.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    B2B multi-sided markets; Non-monetary costs;

    JEL classification:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:hal:journl:hal-02376038. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: CCSD (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.