IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/hal/journl/hal-02312194.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Twittare le news : giornalisti hard e testate soft. Uno studio di caso di tre redazioni

Author

Listed:
  • Sergio Splendore

    (UNIMI - Università degli Studi di Milano = University of Milan)

  • Alessandro Caliandro

    (UNIMI - Università degli Studi di Milano = University of Milan)

  • Massimo Airoldi

    (UNIMI - Università degli Studi di Milano = University of Milan)

Abstract

This article consists in a case study analysing three Italian digital newsrooms. The research investigates the ways in which editors in chief and newsrooms use Twitter. The journalistic use of Twitter has been the object of a growing number of researches in several national contexts. Their results are hardly generalizable and largely context-dependent. This work observes the choices made by editors in chief concerning their use of social media profiles both on the level of newsroom and from an individual perspective. Following the literature, this analysis points to two theoretical lines: the level of interaction towards Twitter followers and the distribution of soft or hard news. The empirical investigation is based on semi-structured interviews with editors in chief and social media managers as well as on the analysis of tweets produced by their Twitter accounts. Results show that, in the flow everyday newsroom production, Twitter works prevalently as a way to distribute contents. On the contrary, journalists' individual profiles present legitimation practices regarding both their personal brand and journalism itself.

Suggested Citation

  • Sergio Splendore & Alessandro Caliandro & Massimo Airoldi, 2016. "Twittare le news : giornalisti hard e testate soft. Uno studio di caso di tre redazioni," Post-Print hal-02312194, HAL.
  • Handle: RePEc:hal:journl:hal-02312194
    DOI: 10.3270/82887
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    To our knowledge, this item is not available for download. To find whether it is available, there are three options:
    1. Check below whether another version of this item is available online.
    2. Check on the provider's web page whether it is in fact available.
    3. Perform a search for a similarly titled item that would be available.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:hal:journl:hal-02312194. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: CCSD (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.