IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/hal/journl/hal-02100320.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

The institutionalization of supply chain corporate social responsibility: field formation in comparative context

Author

Listed:
  • Jennifer Bair

    (University of Colorado [Boulder])

  • Florence Palpacuer

    (MRM - Montpellier Research in Management - UPVM - Université Paul-Valéry - Montpellier 3 - UPVD - Université de Perpignan Via Domitia - Groupe Sup de Co Montpellier (GSCM) - Montpellier Business School - UM - Université de Montpellier)

Abstract

On December 14, 2010, twenty-nine people perished in a factory fire in Dhaka, Bangladesh. At the time of the fire, the factory, "That's It Sportswear," was subcontracting for several well-known brands and retailers, including Gap, J.C. Penney, and Abercrombie & Fitch. In the aftermath of the tragedy, activists called on these and other leading American and European companies to address the high incidence of fire-related workplace deaths occurring annually in Bangladesh. On March 21, 2012, one of the brands that had been placing orders with the factory at the time of the fire, Philips Van Heusen (PVH), signed a contractual, two-year landmark fire safety agreement. Under this agreement, which had been negotiated with local and international nongovernmental organizations (INGOs) and trade unions, Philips Van Heusen committed to spending at least $1 million on improving worker safety via independent inspection of its Bangladeshi suppliers, disclosure and remediation of inspection results, and the creation of worker-led health and safety committees in all supplier factories. Given the lack of an equity relationship between PVH and its subcontractors, and in the absence of any legal obligation on the part of PVH toward the workers employed by its suppliers, how do we explain PVH's voluntary decision to make these commitments? The Bangladesh fire safety agreement is an outgrowth of the phenomenon analyzed in this chapter, which we call "supply chain corporate social responsibility (CSR)": the discourses and practices by which firms voluntarily pledge to guarantee labor standards in the production facilities of independent suppliers. At one level, this phenomenon is not new; since the 1960s, there have been numerous initiatives to develop voluntary schemes addressing the social and developmental implications of multinational corporations and their overseas subsidiaries, particularly in the Global South. These include the OECD Guidelines for Multinational Enterprises (1976), the International Labour Organization (ILO) Tripartite Declaration of Principles concerning Multinational Enterprises and Social Policy (1977), and the United Nations' decade-long project to draft a code of conduct for multinational corporations.

Suggested Citation

  • Jennifer Bair & Florence Palpacuer, 2015. "The institutionalization of supply chain corporate social responsibility: field formation in comparative context," Post-Print hal-02100320, HAL.
  • Handle: RePEc:hal:journl:hal-02100320
    DOI: 10.1017/CBO9781316162354.006
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    To our knowledge, this item is not available for download. To find whether it is available, there are three options:
    1. Check below whether another version of this item is available online.
    2. Check on the provider's web page whether it is in fact available.
    3. Perform a search for a similarly titled item that would be available.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Mathias Koenig‐Archibugi, 2017. "Does transnational private governance reduce or displace labor abuses? Addressing sorting dynamics across global supply chains," Regulation & Governance, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 11(4), pages 343-352, December.
    2. Koenig-Archibugi, Mathias, 2017. "Does transnational private governance reduce or displace labor abuses? Addressing sorting dynamics across global supply chains," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 83517, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:hal:journl:hal-02100320. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: CCSD (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.