IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/hal/journl/hal-02090438.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Impacts and challenges of the surgical robot in the operating blocks Moving from individual technical skills to collective non-technical skills
[Impacts et enjeux du robot chirurgical dans les blocs opératoires. Passer des compétences techniques individuelles aux compétences non-techniques collectives]

Author

Listed:
  • Delphine Wannenmacher

    (CEREFIGE - Centre Européen de Recherche en Economie Financière et Gestion des Entreprises - UL - Université de Lorraine)

Abstract

The laparoscopy is a "minimal invasive" surgery that has benefits for the patient over conventional open surgery. It does, however, have many drawbacks and constraints that require a relatively long period of adaptation and learning to acquire new technical skills. Although it also calls for the development of new technical skills of its own, the robotic tool has, however, provided solutions to the intrinsic limits of laparoscopy by allowing for a more intuitive, precise and less constrained surgical act. The robot-assisted surgery nevertheless creates other drawbacks, at a more collective level this time, particularly in terms of communication and teamwork. The analysis of the activity of an operating block using the surgical robot, based on a literature review, on several observations within operating blocks and training sessions in robotic surgery, on a video capture of a urology surgical intervention and on self-confrontation interviews, highlighted the impact of the surgical robot in an operating block and the challenges in terms of collective non-technical skills.

Suggested Citation

  • Delphine Wannenmacher, 2019. "Impacts and challenges of the surgical robot in the operating blocks Moving from individual technical skills to collective non-technical skills [Impacts et enjeux du robot chirurgical dans les bloc," Post-Print hal-02090438, HAL.
  • Handle: RePEc:hal:journl:hal-02090438
    DOI: 10.3917/jges.194.0316
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    To our knowledge, this item is not available for download. To find whether it is available, there are three options:
    1. Check below whether another version of this item is available online.
    2. Check on the provider's web page whether it is in fact available.
    3. Perform a search for a similarly titled item that would be available.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:hal:journl:hal-02090438. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: CCSD (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.