IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/hal/journl/hal-02078574.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Business organisations as symbiotic systems: Internal tensions, specific forms and control mechanisms

Author

Listed:
  • Calin Gurău

    (MRM - Montpellier Research in Management - UPVM - Université Paul-Valéry - Montpellier 3 - UPVD - Université de Perpignan Via Domitia - Groupe Sup de Co Montpellier (GSCM) - Montpellier Business School - UM - Université de Montpellier)

Abstract

Living systems represent a popular paradigm for business organisations, which explains the organizational characteristics of self-identity, autopoiesis, self-regulation, and co-evolution with the environment (Kandjani et al., 2013; Vancouver, 1996; Velentzas,Broni, 2011). This paper contributes to the development and clarification of this paradigm, proposing that business organisations can be best represented as symbiotic systems, nested in dynamic ecosystems. The force of the symbiotic system paradigm is derived from the observation that an organisation represents a collection of individuals which collaborate in order to achieve a common goal (Scott, 2008). On the other hand, each participating individual has its own interests, which can create tensions between the individual and collective goals and interests. These tensions are solved through a dynamic equilibrium between opportunism and collaborating benefits, studied by the Game Theory (Myerson, 1991). As in biological symbiotic systems, in business organisations the relationships between various individuals "does not imply a strict compartimentation of interspecific relationships, representing a continuous and dynamic process of different relations, such asmutualism, parasitism and commensalism" (Carrapiço, 2012).In practice, this dynamic equilibrium is realised through inter-individual communication and specific control mechanisms which introduce implicit and/or explicit self-regulating mechanisms which keep in check the internal organizational tensions (Vancouver, 1996). The control mechanisms applied within business organisations to achieve the dynamic equilibrium between individual, group and organizational interests, include four levers (Simons, 1995):(1) beliefs, (2) boundary, (3) diagnostic, and (4) interactive systems. Applying this interpretative framework, the study applied a case study methodology to investigate three instances of symbiotic systems: firms, strategic alliances and meta-organizations. Using an exploratory approach tooted in grounded theory methodology, the study indicates characteristics of the symbiotic parties, the structure of internal collaboration, the main sources of internal tensions, and the control levers applied in each situation. The findings indicate that all four levers are required to create a dynamic equilibrium between positive and negative control forces within these symbiotic systems (Simons, 1995). The theoretical and practical implications of the symbiotic system paradigm are discussed and a series of organizational principles are formulated, to describe the basic relational framework of these systems.

Suggested Citation

  • Calin Gurău, 2015. "Business organisations as symbiotic systems: Internal tensions, specific forms and control mechanisms," Post-Print hal-02078574, HAL.
  • Handle: RePEc:hal:journl:hal-02078574
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    To our knowledge, this item is not available for download. To find whether it is available, there are three options:
    1. Check below whether another version of this item is available online.
    2. Check on the provider's web page whether it is in fact available.
    3. Perform a search for a similarly titled item that would be available.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:hal:journl:hal-02078574. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: CCSD (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.