IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/hal/journl/hal-02078509.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Voluntary disclosure and investor reaction to downsizing announcements: A legitimacy perspective

Author

Listed:
  • Emmanuelle Nègre

    (MRM - Montpellier Research in Management - UPVM - Université Paul-Valéry - Montpellier 3 - UPVD - Université de Perpignan Via Domitia - Groupe Sup de Co Montpellier (GSCM) - Montpellier Business School - UM - Université de Montpellier, UT3 - Université Toulouse III - Paul Sabatier - UT - Université de Toulouse)

  • Marie-Anne Verdier

    (UT Capitole - Université Toulouse Capitole - UT - Université de Toulouse)

Abstract

This paper investigates the determinants and consequences of firms' decisions to disclose press releases to announce downsizing operations. We also examine the content of press releases and its influence on investor reactions to downsizing announcements. Considering downsizing operations as negative CSR events, we assume that managers use disclosure strategies to counter a potential legitimacy threat. Our sample consists of 227 downsizing operations announced between 2007 and 2012. We find that the disclosure of press releases is mainly driven by legitimacy-related factors. We also find that press releases are associated with more negative reactions than when there is no press release, particularly in the case of proactive operations. A content analysis of press releases indicates that investors penalize the use of proactive arguments, particularly when they are used to justify proactive operations. Overall, our results show that disclosure strategies and their consequences on the financial markets relate to a legitimacy perspective.

Suggested Citation

  • Emmanuelle Nègre & Marie-Anne Verdier, 2015. "Voluntary disclosure and investor reaction to downsizing announcements: A legitimacy perspective," Post-Print hal-02078509, HAL.
  • Handle: RePEc:hal:journl:hal-02078509
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    To our knowledge, this item is not available for download. To find whether it is available, there are three options:
    1. Check below whether another version of this item is available online.
    2. Check on the provider's web page whether it is in fact available.
    3. Perform a search for a similarly titled item that would be available.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:hal:journl:hal-02078509. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: CCSD (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.