IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/hal/journl/hal-02075955.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Development and protection, what arbitration in the metropolitan planning of Marseille and Nantes? The tricky land management of business parks
[Développement et protection, quel(s) arbitrage(s) dans la planification métropolitaine de Marseille et de Nantes ? La délicate gestion du foncier des zones d’activité économique]

Author

Listed:
  • Fabien Nadou

    (Métis Lab EM Normandie - EM Normandie - École de Management de Normandie)

  • Nicolas Douay

    (GC (UMR_8504) - Géographie-cités - UP1 - Université Paris 1 Panthéon-Sorbonne - UPD7 - Université Paris Diderot - Paris 7 - CNRS - Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique)

Abstract

Major French cities, structured into intermunicipal institutions, saw their competences and spatial policies developed since the early 2000s with the laws SRU and following by the Grenelle 2 of environment (2010). This article aims to highlight the similarities / differences and innovations / persistence, observed in the articulation of issues of economic development and environmental protection in strategic spatial planning practices. More specifically, it is a question of territorial coherence schemes (SCoT) of Marseille Provence Métropole and Nantes Saint-Nazaire.

Suggested Citation

  • Fabien Nadou & Nicolas Douay, 2016. "Development and protection, what arbitration in the metropolitan planning of Marseille and Nantes? The tricky land management of business parks [Développement et protection, quel(s) arbitrage(s) da," Post-Print hal-02075955, HAL.
    • Handle: RePEc:hal:journl:hal-02075955
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    To our knowledge, this item is not available for download. To find whether it is available, there are three options:
    1. Check below whether another version of this item is available online.
    2. Check on the provider's web page whether it is in fact available.
    3. Perform a search for a similarly titled item that would be available.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:hal:journl:hal-02075955. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: CCSD (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.