IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/hal/journl/hal-02010900.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

L'évaluation de l'importance des attributs Comparaison de six méthodes

Author

Listed:
  • James Jaccard
  • David Brinberg
  • Lee J. Ackerman

    (University at Albany [SUNY] - SUNY - State University of New York)

Abstract

Six méthodes de mesure de l'importance des attributs ont été évaluées du point de vue de la validité convergente. Ces méthodes sont: 1) Une approche déclarative directe; 2) Une approche par la recherche d'information fondée sur la méthode du processus comportemental de Jacoby; 3) La notation directe de l'importance; 4) La méthode des mesures conjointes; 3) Des indices basés sur l'approche de la probabilité subjective de Jaccard; et 6) Une approche de comparaisons par paires. La validité convergente des méthodes de mesure d'importance a été étudiée pour deux catégories de produits: les contraceptifs et les voitures. Les résultats ont montré des niveaux plutôt bas de convergence des mesures.

Suggested Citation

  • James Jaccard & David Brinberg & Lee J. Ackerman, 1986. "L'évaluation de l'importance des attributs Comparaison de six méthodes," Post-Print hal-02010900, HAL.
    • Handle: RePEc:hal:journl:hal-02010900
    DOI: 10.1177/076737018600100402
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    To our knowledge, this item is not available for download. To find whether it is available, there are three options:
    1. Check below whether another version of this item is available online.
    2. Check on the provider's web page whether it is in fact available.
    3. Perform a search for a similarly titled item that would be available.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:hal:journl:hal-02010900. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: CCSD (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.