IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/hal/journl/hal-01929223.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Adoption or Reject of Innovation, an Approach by Prospects Theory: The Case of Lower Alcohol Wine
[Adoption ou rejet de l’innovation, une approche par la théorie des prospects : le cas des vins allégés en alcool]

Author

Listed:
  • Rossella Sorio

    (ICN Business School, CEREFIGE - Centre Européen de Recherche en Economie Financière et Gestion des Entreprises - UL - Université de Lorraine)

  • Béatrice Siadou-Martin

    (CEREFIGE - Centre Européen de Recherche en Economie Financière et Gestion des Entreprises - UL - Université de Lorraine)

Abstract

This research focuses on the impact of changing alcohol content, perceived as a central attribute of the "wine" category, on categorization and consumer preferences. It was conducted with French and Italian consumers, two countries characterized by an old wine tradition. This study shows that the modification of the central attribute "alcohol content" impacts the categorization, because few people, in France or Italy, identify the wine lightened in alcohol as a wine. On the other hand, the results between the two countries differ when one considers the importance of the "alcohol content" criteria when buying and consuming wine. While for French respondents this attribute isn't a discriminating criteria, it is of prime importance at the moment of purchase and consumption among Italian respondents. The managerial implications, particularly in terms of possible innovations for the wine sector, are finally discussed.

Suggested Citation

  • Rossella Sorio & Béatrice Siadou-Martin, 2019. "Adoption or Reject of Innovation, an Approach by Prospects Theory: The Case of Lower Alcohol Wine [Adoption ou rejet de l’innovation, une approche par la théorie des prospects : le cas des vins all," Post-Print hal-01929223, HAL.
  • Handle: RePEc:hal:journl:hal-01929223
    DOI: 10.3917/inno.058.0161
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    To our knowledge, this item is not available for download. To find whether it is available, there are three options:
    1. Check below whether another version of this item is available online.
    2. Check on the provider's web page whether it is in fact available.
    3. Perform a search for a similarly titled item that would be available.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:hal:journl:hal-01929223. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: CCSD (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.