Hiroshima et l'entreprise : management, gouvernance et dialogue social

In one of his books, Günther Anders, the great Austrian philosopher, observe that the division of work between workers, in large enterprises, deprives often each worker of the sense of what he is doing. So, he cannot have access to the global sense of the organization in which he is involved. It is the reason why he participates sometimes to a collective action in contradiction with his own convictions. Anders gives as an exemple the case of one of the pilots of the Air Force raid aimed at the atomic bombing on Hiroshima in 1945. Can it be otherwise ? It should be necessary for the enterprise to consider, not only in-vesters interests, but equally employees interests. A radical modification of the law would be necessary for this purpose. Good management is not enough for workers to be really involved in the common action. This purpose requires a coherence between the management , the human relations, the negociation with the unions, the relations with the community and the aims of the organization. For companies, this means a global change of their institutional and legal frame.