IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/hal/journl/hal-01709478.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Retailers’ communication on ugly fruits and vegetables: What are consumers’ perceptions?

Author

Listed:
  • Didier Louis

    (LEMNA - Laboratoire d'économie et de management de Nantes Atlantique - IEMN-IAE Nantes - Institut d'Économie et de Management de Nantes - Institut d'Administration des Entreprises - Nantes - UN - Université de Nantes)

  • Cindy Lombart

    (Audencia Recherche - Audencia Business School)

Abstract

This research investigates retailers' societal advertisements on ugly fruits and vegetables. A three (retailer's claim is focusing on consumers' health, on food taste, on food price) x 2 (the retailer studied is Intermarché, Biocoop) between subjects design has been conducted. Several paths that retailers can follow in order to build the credibility of their message and consumers' attitude toward the ad (the two explanatory variables relating to the message) as well as consumers' trust in the retailer and their attitude toward this retailer (two explained variables relating to the retailer) are indicated. The direct and indirect impacts of societal advertisements on ugly fruits and vegetables on consumers' relationship with retailers are thus pointed out.

Suggested Citation

  • Didier Louis & Cindy Lombart, 2018. "Retailers’ communication on ugly fruits and vegetables: What are consumers’ perceptions?," Post-Print hal-01709478, HAL.
    • Handle: RePEc:hal:journl:hal-01709478
    DOI: 10.1016/j.jretconser.2018.01.006
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    To our knowledge, this item is not available for download. To find whether it is available, there are three options:
    1. Check below whether another version of this item is available online.
    2. Check on the provider's web page whether it is in fact available.
    3. Perform a search for a similarly titled item that would be available.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Qi, Danyi & Penn, Jerrod & Li, Ran & Roe, Brian E., 2022. "Winning ugly: Profit maximizing marketing strategies for ugly foods," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 64(C).
    2. Aschemann-Witzel, Jessica & de Hooge, Ilona E. & Almli, Valérie L., 2021. "My style, my food, my waste! Consumer food waste-related lifestyle segments," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 59(C).
    3. D. Louis & C. Lombart, 2024. "Impact of a corporate social responsibility message on consumers’ sustainable behaviours and purchase intentions," Post-Print hal-04386727, HAL.
    4. Grappe, Cindy G. & Lombart, Cindy & Louis, Didier & Durif, Fabien, 2022. "Clean labeling: Is it about the presence of benefits or the absence of detriments? Consumer response to personal care claims," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 65(C).
    5. Makhal, Annesha & Thyne, Maree & Robertson, Kirsten & Mirosa, Miranda, 2020. "“I don't like wonky carrots†- an exploration of children's perceptions of suboptimal fruits and vegetables," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 54(C).
    6. Sina Nitzko & Achim Spiller, 2019. "Comparing “Leaf-to-Root”, “Nose-to-Tail” and Other Efficient Food Utilization Options from a Consumer Perspective," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(17), pages 1-21, September.
    7. Hezarkhani, Behzad & Demirel, Guven & Bouchery, Yann & Dora, Manoj, 2023. "Can “ugly veg” supply chains reduce food loss?," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 309(1), pages 117-132.
    8. Efrat Elimelech & Eyal Ert & Yael Parag & Guy Hochman, 2024. "Exploring the Impact of Visual Perception and Taste Experience on Consumers’ Acceptance of Suboptimal Fresh Produce," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(7), pages 1-14, March.
    9. Ginder, Whitney & Byun, Sang-Eun, 2022. "To trust or not to trust? The interplay between labor-related CSR claim type and prior CSR reputation of apparel retailers," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 65(C).
    10. Cindy Grappe & Cindy Lombart & Didier Louis & Fabien Durif, 2022. "Clean labeling: Is it about the presence of benefits or the absence of detriments? Consumer response to personal care claims," Post-Print hal-04293232, HAL.
    11. Debucquet, Gervaise & Lombart, Cindy & Labbé-Pinlon, Blandine, 2021. "Depicting eaters and non-eaters of abnormal fruits and vegetables: Reflections of self-identity and food culture," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 62(C).
    12. de Souza, Michele & Pereira, Giancarlo Medeiros & Lopes de Sousa Jabbour, Ana Beatriz & Chiappetta Jabbour, Charbel Jose & Trento, Luiz Reni & Borchardt, Miriam & Zvirtes, Leandro, 2021. "A digitally enabled circular economy for mitigating food waste: Understanding innovative marketing strategies in the context of an emerging economy," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 173(C).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:hal:journl:hal-01709478. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: CCSD (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.