IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/hal/journl/hal-01685916.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Le secteur optionnel : effet d’aubaine ou outil de régulation des dépassements ?

Author

Listed:
  • Anne-Laure Samson

    (LEDa - Laboratoire d'Economie de Dauphine - Université Paris Dauphine-PSL - PSL - Université Paris Sciences et Lettres)

  • Vanessa Bellamy

Abstract

In France, physicians, who are paid under a fee-for-service scheme, belong to two "sectors": in sector 1, overbilling is forbidden whereas it is allowed in sector 2. Given the huge increase in overbilling over the past few years, the French government decided in March 2012 to create a new sector (named "secteur optionnel") that restricts the amount of overbilling allowed, and that physicians can voluntarily join. Using two exhaustive datasets on all physicians practicing in France in 2008 (one drawn from fiscal records, the other by the public health insurance), the aim of the paper is to examine the attractiveness of this new sector, its potential impact on the global amount of overbilling and its cost for the public health insurance. We find that 40% of physicians would benefit financially from joining this new sector but the impact on overbilling appears to be rather limited: depending on the assumptions, it would lead to a 7% drop or to a small increase. Beyond the legal definition of the "secteur optionnel", we study the impact of several other possible mechanisms aimed at controlling overbilling: making the "secteur optionnel" compulsory for all physicians, or only for those who settle in an area where medical density is already very high. Our simulations cast a new light on the debate on excess medical fees and their regulation, in a context in which the offer under reference fees is running rare.

Suggested Citation

  • Anne-Laure Samson & Vanessa Bellamy, 2012. "Le secteur optionnel : effet d’aubaine ou outil de régulation des dépassements ?," Post-Print hal-01685916, HAL.
    • Handle: RePEc:hal:journl:hal-01685916
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    To our knowledge, this item is not available for download. To find whether it is available, there are three options:
    1. Check below whether another version of this item is available online.
    2. Check on the provider's web page whether it is in fact available.
    3. Perform a search for a similarly titled item that would be available.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:hal:journl:hal-01685916. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: CCSD (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.