IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/hal/journl/hal-01672415.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Comparison Between Continuous Review Inventory Control Systems for Perishables With Deterministic Lifetime and Lead Time

Author

Listed:
  • Zied Jemai

    (LGI - Laboratoire Génie Industriel - EA 2606 - CentraleSupélec)

  • Chaaben Kouki

    (LGI - Laboratoire Génie Industriel - EA 2606 - CentraleSupélec)

  • Evren Sahin

    (LGI - Laboratoire Génie Industriel - EA 2606 - CentraleSupélec)

  • Yves Dallery

    (LGI - Laboratoire Génie Industriel - EA 2606 - CentraleSupélec)

Abstract

—This paper aims at comparing and verifying the effectiveness of existing (,) inventory systems for perishables with fixed lead time and lifetime. The total inventory operating costs are compared to measure the performance for each policy in order to choose the best one that leads to the lowest cost. We show that, under backordered demand, the (,) policy obtained from [8] deviates on average by less than one percent from the optimal (,) policy and performs better than a previous model developed by Chiu [2] when ≥. When excess demand are lost, Chiu's model [2] performs better than the model of [8]. But both models are unsuitable when the ordering cost increases.

Suggested Citation

  • Zied Jemai & Chaaben Kouki & Evren Sahin & Yves Dallery, 2013. "Comparison Between Continuous Review Inventory Control Systems for Perishables With Deterministic Lifetime and Lead Time," Post-Print hal-01672415, HAL.
    • Handle: RePEc:hal:journl:hal-01672415
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    To our knowledge, this item is not available for download. To find whether it is available, there are three options:
    1. Check below whether another version of this item is available online.
    2. Check on the provider's web page whether it is in fact available.
    3. Perform a search for a similarly titled item that would be available.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:hal:journl:hal-01672415. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: CCSD (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.