IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/hal/journl/hal-01658247.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

A Micro-Analysis of Heterogeneous Institutional Logics in the Environmental Audit
[L’audit environnemental : un dispositif de gestion à l’épreuve de logiques institutionnelles hétérogènes]

Author

Listed:
  • Angèle Renaud

    (CREGO - Centre de Recherche en Gestion des Organisations (EA 7317) - Université de Haute-Alsace (UHA) - Université de Haute-Alsace (UHA) Mulhouse - Colmar - UB - Université de Bourgogne - UBFC - Université Bourgogne Franche-Comté [COMUE] - UFC - Université de Franche-Comté - UBFC - Université Bourgogne Franche-Comté [COMUE])

Abstract

The objective of this paper is to highlight how the environmental audit reconciles heterogeneous institutional logics in order to contribute to the microfoundations of institutional theory. Using a case study approach, we explore the environmental audit of a French company in rubber and plastics industry which faces four heterogeneous institutional logics (environmental logic, financial logic, market logic and legitimacy logic). The results show that the environmental audit is a "chameleon" management tool that can take many forms to suit the institutional complexity. Each form of the environmental audit hybridizes two logics and its characteristics (technical substrate, management philosophy, simplified vision of organizational relationships) evolve in line with the dynamic hybridization. Finally, the concept of "organizational polymorphism" is proposed to explain this organizational change process.

Suggested Citation

  • Angèle Renaud, 2017. "A Micro-Analysis of Heterogeneous Institutional Logics in the Environmental Audit [L’audit environnemental : un dispositif de gestion à l’épreuve de logiques institutionnelles hétérogènes]," Post-Print hal-01658247, HAL.
  • Handle: RePEc:hal:journl:hal-01658247
    DOI: 10.4000/fcs.1995
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    To our knowledge, this item is not available for download. To find whether it is available, there are three options:
    1. Check below whether another version of this item is available online.
    2. Check on the provider's web page whether it is in fact available.
    3. Perform a search for a similarly titled item that would be available.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:hal:journl:hal-01658247. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: CCSD (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.