IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/hal/journl/hal-01648438.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Usage-driven problem design for radical innovation in healthcare

Author

Listed:
  • Guillaume Lamé

    (LGI - Laboratoire Génie Industriel - EA 2606 - CentraleSupélec)

  • Bernard Yannou

    (LGI - Laboratoire Génie Industriel - EA 2606 - CentraleSupélec, LGI - Laboratoire Génie Industriel - EA 2606 - CentraleSupélec)

  • François Cluzel

    (LGI - Laboratoire Génie Industriel - EA 2606 - CentraleSupélec)

Abstract

Whilst the diffusion and evaluation of healthcare innovations receive a lot of attention, the early design stages are less studied and potential innovators lack methods to identify where new innovations are necessary and to propose concepts relevant to users. To change this, we propose a structured methodology, Radical Innovation Design ® (RID), which supports designers who want to work on the unstated needs of potential end-users in order to create superior value. In this article, the first part of RID is introduced with its two sub-processes: Problem Design and Knowledge Design. In this first period, RID guides innovators to systematically explore users' problems and evaluate which ones are most pressing in terms of innovation, taking into account existing solutions. The result is an ambition perimeter, composed of a set of value buckets, i.e. important usage situations where major problems are experienced and the current solutions provide little or no relief. The methodology then moves on to Solution Design and Business Design (which are not detailed in this paper) to address the value buckets identified. With its emphasis on problem exploration, RID differs from methods based on early prototyping. The RID methodology has been validated in various industrial sectors, and is well-adapted for healthcare innovation. To exemplify the methodology, we present a case study in dental imagery performed by ten students in 8 weeks. This example demonstrates how RID favors efficiency in Problem Design and allows designers to explore unaddressed and sometimes undeclared user needs.

Suggested Citation

  • Guillaume Lamé & Bernard Yannou & François Cluzel, 2018. "Usage-driven problem design for radical innovation in healthcare," Post-Print hal-01648438, HAL.
  • Handle: RePEc:hal:journl:hal-01648438
    DOI: 10.1136/bmjinnov-2016-000149
    Note: View the original document on HAL open archive server: https://hal.science/hal-01648438
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://hal.science/hal-01648438/document
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1136/bmjinnov-2016-000149?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Sylvain Lenfle & Pascal Le Masson & Benoit Weil, 2016. "When project management meets design theory: revisiting the Manhattan and Polaris projects to characterize “radical innovation," Post-Print hal-01389622, HAL.
    2. Sylvain Lenfle & Pascal Le Masson & Benoit Weil, 2016. "When Project Management Meets Design Theory: Revisiting the Manhattan and Polaris Projects to Characterize ‘Radical Innovation’ and its Managerial Implications," Post-Print hal-01499121, HAL.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Armand Hatchuel & Pascal Le Masson & Yoram Reich & Eswaran Subrahmanian, 2018. "Design theory: a foundation of a new paradigm for design science and engineering," Post-Print hal-01633021, HAL.
    2. Grégory Jemine & François Pichault & Christophe Dubois, 2021. "The politics behind design projects: when space, organization, and technology collide," Post-Print hal-03043335, HAL.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Value bucket; Problem definition; Innovation methodology; Front end of innovation; Need-seeker innovation;
    All these keywords.

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:hal:journl:hal-01648438. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: CCSD (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.