IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/hal/journl/hal-01518732.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Contaminated sites and land use acceptability
[Acceptabilité des choix d’aménagements des friches urbaines polluées]

Author

Listed:
  • Béatrice Plottu

    (GRANEM - Groupe de Recherche Angevin en Economie et Management - UA - Université d'Angers - AGROCAMPUS OUEST - Institut National de l'Horticulture et du Paysage)

  • Marjorie Tendero

    (ADEME - Agence de l'Environnement et de la Maîtrise de l'Energie, GRANEM - Groupe de Recherche Angevin en Economie et Management - UA - Université d'Angers - AGROCAMPUS OUEST - Institut National de l'Horticulture et du Paysage)

Abstract

Brownfield redevelopment provides opportunities to build sustainable cities for the future. However, potential benefits of brownfield redevelopment are underestimated whereas costs are overestimated; brownfields are therefore barelyreused. Besides, economic valuation methods are struggling to determine ex ante benefits and in particularly collective benefits and those which are related to non-direct use. In order to address these limitations, we develop an original methodological framework which combines economic valuation techniques that are available. Focus groups and discrete choice experiment are first employed to assess individual risk attitudes and preferences, and then multi-criteria decision analysis is used to compare individual preferences with collective preferences in order to determine a consensual solution in the case of a brownfield redevelopment project. This methodological approach should improve ex-antestakeholders' involvement and hence social acceptability of land-use plans.

Suggested Citation

  • Béatrice Plottu & Marjorie Tendero, 2017. "Contaminated sites and land use acceptability [Acceptabilité des choix d’aménagements des friches urbaines polluées]," Post-Print hal-01518732, HAL.
    • Handle: RePEc:hal:journl:hal-01518732
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    To our knowledge, this item is not available for download. To find whether it is available, there are three options:
    1. Check below whether another version of this item is available online.
    2. Check on the provider's web page whether it is in fact available.
    3. Perform a search for a similarly titled item that would be available.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:hal:journl:hal-01518732. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: CCSD (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.