IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/hal/journl/hal-01511250.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Hospital network performance: A survey of hospital stakeholders’ perspectives

Author

Listed:
  • F. Bravi
  • D. Gibertoni
  • A. Marcon

    (Unit of Epidemiology and Medical Statistics - UNIVR - Università degli studi di Verona = University of Verona)

  • Claude Sicotte

    (EA MOS - EA Management des Organisations de Santé - EHESP - École des Hautes Études en Santé Publique [EHESP] - PRES Sorbonne Paris Cité)

  • Etienne Minvielle

    (COMPAQ(HSPT) - U988 - COordination pour la Mesure de la Performance et l'Amélioration de la Qualité ( Hôpital, Patient, Sécurité, Territoire) - IGR - Institut Gustave Roussy - EHESP - École des Hautes Études en Santé Publique [EHESP] - INSERM - Institut National de la Santé et de la Recherche Médicale, EA MOS - EA Management des Organisations de Santé - EHESP - École des Hautes Études en Santé Publique [EHESP] - PRES Sorbonne Paris Cité, IGR - Institut Gustave Roussy)

  • P. Rucci

    (DPNFB - University of Pisa - Università di Pisa, Western Psychiatric Institute and Clinic - PITT - University of Pittsburgh - Pennsylvania Commonwealth System of Higher Education (PCSHE))

  • A. Angelastro
  • T. Carradori
  • M.P. Fantini

    (Department of Public Health - UNIBO - Alma Mater Studiorum Università di Bologna = University of Bologna)

Abstract

Hospital networks are an emerging organizational form designed to face the new challenges of public health systems. Although the benefits introduced by network models in terms of rationalization of resources are known, evidence about stakeholders' perspectives on hospital network performance from the literature is scanty. Using the Competing Values Framework of organizational effectiveness and its subsequent adaptation by Minvielle et al., we conducted in 2009 a survey in five hospitals of an Italian network for oncological care to examine and compare the views on hospital network performance of internal stakeholders (physicians, nurses and the administrative staff). 329 questionnaires exploring stakeholders' perspectives were completed, with a response rate of 65.8%. Using exploratory factor analysis of the 66 items of the questionnaire, we identified 4 factors, i.e. Centrality of relationships, Quality of care, Attractiveness/Reputation and Staff empowerment and Protection of workers' rights. 42 items were retained in the analysis. Factor scores proved to be high (mean score > 8 on a 10-item scale), except for Attractiveness/Reputation (mean score 6.79), indicating that stakeholders attach a higher importance to relational and health care aspects. Comparison of factor scores among stakeholders did not reveal significant differences, suggesting a broadly shared view on hospital network performance.

Suggested Citation

  • F. Bravi & D. Gibertoni & A. Marcon & Claude Sicotte & Etienne Minvielle & P. Rucci & A. Angelastro & T. Carradori & M.P. Fantini, 2012. "Hospital network performance: A survey of hospital stakeholders’ perspectives," Post-Print hal-01511250, HAL.
  • Handle: RePEc:hal:journl:hal-01511250
    DOI: 10.1016/j.healthpol.2012.11.003
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    To our knowledge, this item is not available for download. To find whether it is available, there are three options:
    1. Check below whether another version of this item is available online.
    2. Check on the provider's web page whether it is in fact available.
    3. Perform a search for a similarly titled item that would be available.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:hal:journl:hal-01511250. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: CCSD (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.