IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/hal/journl/hal-01482516.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Differential Diagnosis of Meningeal SFT-HPC and Meningioma Which ă Immunohistochemical Markers Should Be Used?

Author

Listed:
  • Nicolas Macagno
  • Dominique Figarella-Branger

    (CRO2 - Centre de Recherches en Oncologie biologique et Oncopharmacologie - AMU - Aix Marseille Université - TIMONE - Hôpital de la Timone [CHU - APHM] - INSERM - Institut National de la Santé et de la Recherche Médicale, TIMONE - Hôpital de la Timone [CHU - APHM])

  • Karima Mokthari
  • Philippe Metellus

    (CRO2 - Centre de Recherches en Oncologie biologique et Oncopharmacologie - AMU - Aix Marseille Université - TIMONE - Hôpital de la Timone [CHU - APHM] - INSERM - Institut National de la Santé et de la Recherche Médicale)

  • Anne Jouvet

    (Hôpital neurologique et neurochirurgical Pierre Wertheimer [CHU - HCL] - HCL - Hospices Civils de Lyon)

  • Alexandre Vasiljevic

    (Service de Pathologie - HCL - Hospices Civils de Lyon - Hôpital neurologique et neurochirurgical Pierre Wertheimer [CHU - HCL] - HCL - Hospices Civils de Lyon)

  • Anderson Loundou

    (Unité d'Aide Méthodologique - APHM - Assistance Publique - Hôpitaux de Marseille - CHU Marseille)

  • Corinne Bouvier

    (ECOLAG - Ecosystèmes lagunaires : organisation biologique et fonctionnement - UM2 - Université Montpellier 2 - Sciences et Techniques - IFREMER - Institut Français de Recherche pour l'Exploitation de la Mer - CNRS - Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique)

Abstract

Meningeal solitary fibrous tumors-hemangiopericytomas (SFT-HPC) and ă meningiomas can be difficult to distinguish on histologic examination. ă STAT6 immunohistochemistry (IHC) is a reliable diagnostic marker of ă SFT-HPCs. Recently, GRIA2 has also been reported to be a diagnostic ă marker of SFT-HPC, although no extensive data are available for ă meningeal SFT-HPCs yet. The aim of this study was to test their ă diagnostic performance in a large cohort of SFT-HPCs and meningiomas. ă IHC analyses for GRIA2 and STAT6 were performed on tissue microarrays ă containing 76 SFT-HPCs and 181 meningiomas. Results were compared with ă previous data with ALDH1 and CD34. Two different anti-STAT6 antibodies ă were tested: SC-20 polyclonal and YE361 monoclonal antibody. Ninety-six ă percent of meningeal SFT-HPCs but no meningioma displayed nuclear STAT6 ă positivity. With SC-20 antibody, concomitant cytoplasmic staining for ă STAT6 was observed in > 50% of all cases, including meningiomas. ă However, using YE361 antibody, cytoplasmic staining was absent, and ă nuclear signal intensity was stronger leading to better interpretation ă of STAT6 IHC. GRIA2 was positive in 84% of SFT-HPCs and in 16% of ă meningiomas. STAT6 had excellent sensitivity (96%) and specificity ă (100%), ALDH1 and GRIA2 had same sensitivity (84%), but ALDH1 and CD34 ă had better specificity than GRIA2 (97% and 96% vs. 84%, ă respectively). For the differential diagnosis of SFT-HPCs versus ă meningiomas, the best diagnostic approach is to perform STAT6, followed ă by ALDH1 and CD34 in the case of uncommon STAT6-negative cases. Because ă of meningioma positivity, GRIA2 seems less useful in this indication.

Suggested Citation

  • Nicolas Macagno & Dominique Figarella-Branger & Karima Mokthari & Philippe Metellus & Anne Jouvet & Alexandre Vasiljevic & Anderson Loundou & Corinne Bouvier, 2016. "Differential Diagnosis of Meningeal SFT-HPC and Meningioma Which ă Immunohistochemical Markers Should Be Used?," Post-Print hal-01482516, HAL.
  • Handle: RePEc:hal:journl:hal-01482516
    DOI: 10.1097/PAS.0000000000000526
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    To our knowledge, this item is not available for download. To find whether it is available, there are three options:
    1. Check below whether another version of this item is available online.
    2. Check on the provider's web page whether it is in fact available.
    3. Perform a search for a similarly titled item that would be available.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Quality;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:hal:journl:hal-01482516. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: CCSD (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.