IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/hal/journl/hal-01482509.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

A Bayesian framework systematic review and meta-analysis of anesthetic ă agents effectiveness/tolerability profile in electroconvulsive therapy ă for major depression

Author

Listed:
  • Djamila Bennabi
  • Emmanuel Haffen
  • Lore Brunel
  • Jean-Arthur Micoulaud-Franchi

    (SANPSY - Sommeil, Addiction et Neuropsychiatrie [Bordeaux] - UB - Université de Bordeaux - CHU de Bordeaux Pellegrin [Bordeaux] - CNRS - Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique, Services d’explorations fonctionnelles du système nerveux, clinique du sommeil - CHU Bordeaux)

  • Anderson Loundou

    (Unité d'Aide Méthodologique - APHM - Assistance Publique - Hôpitaux de Marseille - CHU Marseille)

  • Christophe Lançon

    (Hôpitaux Sud - Département Universitaire de Psychiatrie - [Hôpital Sainte Marguerite - APHM] - AMU - Aix Marseille Université - APHM - Assistance Publique - Hôpitaux de Marseille - Hôpitaux Sud - Hôpital Sainte-Marguerite [CHU - APHM])

  • Pierre-Michel Llorca

    (Service de psychiatrie adulte - B - CHU Clermont-Ferrand)

  • Pascal Auquier

    (SPMC - Santé Publique et maladies Chroniques : Qualité de vie Concepts, Usages et Limites, Déterminants - AMU - Aix Marseille Université - APHM - Assistance Publique - Hôpitaux de Marseille)

  • Laurent Boyer

    (C3M - Centre méditerranéen de médecine moléculaire - UNS - Université Nice Sophia Antipolis (1965 - 2019) - INSERM - Institut National de la Santé et de la Recherche Médicale - UniCA - Université Côte d'Azur)

  • Guillaume Fond

    (INSERM U955, équipe 15 - Service de psychiatrie - AP-HP - Assistance publique - Hôpitaux de Paris (AP-HP) - Hôpital Henri Mondor - Hôpital Albert Chenevier - Réseau de coopération scientifique en santé mentale - Fondation FondaMental [Créteil] - IMRB - Institut Mondor de Recherche Biomédicale - INSERM - Institut National de la Santé et de la Recherche Médicale - IFR10 - UPEC UP12 - Université Paris-Est Créteil Val-de-Marne - Paris 12)

Abstract

The aim of this study was to assess the efficacy and ă tolerability/acceptability of 6 anesthetic agents in ECT for depressive ă disorders. We systematically reviewed 14 double-blind randomized ă controlled trials (610 participants). Efficacy was measured by the mean ă scores on validated depression scales at 6 ECT (or the nearest score if ă not available), number of responders at the end of treatment and seizure ă duration. The acceptability was measured by the proportion of patients ă who dropped out of the allocated treatment, and the tolerability by the ă number of serious adverse events and post-treatment cognition ă assessment. After excluding the trials responsible for heterogeneity, ă depression scores of patients who were administered methohexital were ă found to be significantly more improved than those who received propofol ă (p = 0.001). On the contrary, those who were administered propofol had ă lower depression scores than those with thiopental at the end of ă treatment (p = 0.002). Compared to propofol, methohexital was found to ă be significantly associated with higher seizure duration (p = 0.018). No ă difference was found for the acceptability profile (all p > 0.05). In ă summary, ketamine and methohexital may be preferred to propofol or ă thiopental in regard of effectiveness in depression scores and increased ă seizure duration. Further studies are warranted to compare ketamine and ă methohexital.

Suggested Citation

  • Djamila Bennabi & Emmanuel Haffen & Lore Brunel & Jean-Arthur Micoulaud-Franchi & Anderson Loundou & Christophe Lançon & Pierre-Michel Llorca & Pascal Auquier & Laurent Boyer & Guillaume Fond, 2016. "A Bayesian framework systematic review and meta-analysis of anesthetic ă agents effectiveness/tolerability profile in electroconvulsive therapy ă for major depression," Post-Print hal-01482509, HAL.
  • Handle: RePEc:hal:journl:hal-01482509
    DOI: 10.1038/srep19847
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    To our knowledge, this item is not available for download. To find whether it is available, there are three options:
    1. Check below whether another version of this item is available online.
    2. Check on the provider's web page whether it is in fact available.
    3. Perform a search for a similarly titled item that would be available.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Quality;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:hal:journl:hal-01482509. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: CCSD (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.