IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/hal/journl/hal-01482366.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Risk of coexisting endometrial carcinoma in case of atypical endometrial ă hyperplasia diagnosed on total hysteroscopic resection

Author

Listed:
  • Audrey Pivano
  • Patrice Crochet

    (iXFiber SAS - iXFiber SAS)

  • Xavier Carcopino

    (Service de gynécologie-obstétrique [Hôpital Nord - APHM] - AMU - Aix Marseille Université - APHM - Assistance Publique - Hôpitaux de Marseille - Hôpital Nord [CHU - APHM], IMBE - Institut méditerranéen de biodiversité et d'écologie marine et continentale - AU - Avignon Université - AMU - Aix Marseille Université - Institut de recherche pour le développement [IRD] : UMR237 - CNRS - Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique)

  • Ludovic Cravello
  • Leon Boubli

    (AMU MED - Aix-Marseille Université - Faculté de médecine - AMU - Aix Marseille Université)

  • Aubert Agostini

Abstract

Objective: To evaluate the rate of coexisting endometrial carcinoma or ă atypical endometrial hyperplasia (AEH) residue in patients who had a ă total hysteroscopic resection with diagnosis of AEH and without ă suspicious lesions detected during hysteroscopy. ă Study design: This retrospective bicentric study included patients ă diagnosed with AEH on hysteroscopic resection products, and who ă subsequently underwent secondary hysterectomy. Cases of hysteroscopic ă appearance suggesting an endometrial carcinoma were excluded. ă Histopathological results of hysterectomy specimen determined the ă persistence or absence of AEH and the possible presence of coexisting ă endometrial carcinoma. ă Results: Thirty-two patients were selected. Histopathological analysis ă of hysterectomy specimens diagnosed an absence of AEH in 24/32 (75%) ă subjects, an AEH residue in 6/32 (18.8%) subjects and a coexisting ă endometrial carcinoma in 2/32 (6.2%) subjects. ă Conclusion: The risk of missing an endometrial carcinoma in patients ă diagnosed with AEH based on total hysterocopic resection is low when ă there is no suspicious hysteroscopic aspect, but this risk cannot be ă entirely excluded. Total hysteroscopic resection may be a possible ă alternative to hysterectomy in patients with AEH who refuse hysterectomy ă or are a high surgical risk. These patients require a close and long ă term follow-up due to the risks of residual lesion. (C) 2016 Elsevier ă Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.

Suggested Citation

  • Audrey Pivano & Patrice Crochet & Xavier Carcopino & Ludovic Cravello & Leon Boubli & Aubert Agostini, 2016. "Risk of coexisting endometrial carcinoma in case of atypical endometrial ă hyperplasia diagnosed on total hysteroscopic resection," Post-Print hal-01482366, HAL.
  • Handle: RePEc:hal:journl:hal-01482366
    DOI: 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2016.05.049
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    To our knowledge, this item is not available for download. To find whether it is available, there are three options:
    1. Check below whether another version of this item is available online.
    2. Check on the provider's web page whether it is in fact available.
    3. Perform a search for a similarly titled item that would be available.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    quality;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:hal:journl:hal-01482366. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: CCSD (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.