IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/hal/journl/hal-01441810.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Designing and implementing a payment system to support cancer care coordination: A literature review

Author

Listed:
  • Anne Girault

    (EA MOS - EA Management des Organisations de Santé - EHESP - École des Hautes Études en Santé Publique [EHESP] - PRES Sorbonne Paris Cité, IGR - Institut Gustave Roussy)

  • Chloé Gervès-Pinquié

    (EA MOS - EA Management des Organisations de Santé - EHESP - École des Hautes Études en Santé Publique [EHESP] - PRES Sorbonne Paris Cité, IGR - Institut Gustave Roussy)

  • Etienne Minvielle

    (EA MOS - EA Management des Organisations de Santé - EHESP - École des Hautes Études en Santé Publique [EHESP] - PRES Sorbonne Paris Cité, IGR - Institut Gustave Roussy)

Abstract

Background: Demands for new payment systems to better coordinate services along the care continuum are emerging in oncology. Among them, bundling payments for defined episodes of care are considered as a promising payment option. The study objective was to understand how to develop an optimal payment system in order to foster coordination between hospitals and post-acute providers, and to identify potential pitfalls associated with its implementation. Methods: We conducted a literature review, exploring articles published between 2010 and 2015 in Medline. 47 papers were finally retrieved, including 18 articles focusing on cancer care. Results: The review highlighted key issues in the design and implementation of an alternative payment model in oncology. First, some studies explained that the level of integration of the different stakeholders would condition the choice of the payment design. They advised that the enrolled caregivers had a prior experience of working together so that the payment could rely on already formalized care processes. Second, most papers insisted that healthcare professionals had to be included since the design phase to agree on a standardized care pathway that would be consistent with current guidelines. To do so, focus groups and semi-structured interviews conducted with professionals from the enrolled facilities, as well as payers and patient associations, were favored. Third, the review showed that economic evaluations were necessary to have an understanding of the episode costs and determine gain-sharing arrangements between caregivers as well as their respective financial accountability. Using a micro-costing approach and adopting a societal perspective to estimate direct, indirect and intangible costs were demanded. Contingent evaluations measuring professionals' willingness to participate in the payment scheme could serve as complementary analyses. Conclusions: The adoption of a new payment system would be strongly dependent on the design choices and implementation processes. A pilot study assessing its effectiveness in cancer care should bring important knowledge for policymakers willing to develop value-based payment systems in oncology.

Suggested Citation

  • Anne Girault & Chloé Gervès-Pinquié & Etienne Minvielle, 2016. "Designing and implementing a payment system to support cancer care coordination: A literature review," Post-Print hal-01441810, HAL.
  • Handle: RePEc:hal:journl:hal-01441810
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    To our knowledge, this item is not available for download. To find whether it is available, there are three options:
    1. Check below whether another version of this item is available online.
    2. Check on the provider's web page whether it is in fact available.
    3. Perform a search for a similarly titled item that would be available.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Payment; oncology;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:hal:journl:hal-01441810. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: CCSD (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.