IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/hal/journl/hal-01385179.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

la part maudite : un "non savoir" économique ?

Author

Listed:
  • François de March

    (LIRSA - Laboratoire interdisciplinaire de recherche en sciences de l'action - CNAM - Conservatoire National des Arts et Métiers [CNAM] - HESAM - HESAM Université - Communauté d'universités et d'établissements Hautes écoles Sorbonne Arts et métiers université)

Abstract

This article explores the very limited interest in La part maudite by professional economists despite the fact that Bataille considered this book to be a work on "political economics". Was he just trying to provoke or should this be taken seriously ? What is tbe substance of this book ? The argumentation is based on the epistemologicat dispute revealed by the exchange between Bataille and François Perroux - tbe only economist to have debated this issue with the author during his lifetime.

Suggested Citation

  • François de March, 2015. "la part maudite : un "non savoir" économique ?," Post-Print hal-01385179, HAL.
    • Handle: RePEc:hal:journl:hal-01385179
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    To our knowledge, this item is not available for download. To find whether it is available, there are three options:
    1. Check below whether another version of this item is available online.
    2. Check on the provider's web page whether it is in fact available.
    3. Perform a search for a similarly titled item that would be available.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:hal:journl:hal-01385179. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: CCSD (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.