IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/hal/journl/hal-01147929.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Innovations et organisations : quelles logiques conventionnalistes d'interprétation et d'assimilation en sciences de gestion ?

Author

Listed:
  • Serge Lenga

    (CEREGE - Centre de Recherche en Gestion et Entrepreneuriat - UMNG - Université Marien Ngouabi [Brazzaville])

Abstract

The relationship between innovation process and organization is based on a social and cognitive activity distributed over a multiplicity of subjects. This observation leads us to a logical "triadic" in the sense that the cognitive autonomy of actors leads to a permanent reconstruction of meanings, far from the dyadic logic. We postulate that interpreting "convention" is involved in the dynamics of the innovation process to "translate" and "freezing" the interactions between actors: there is an information screen which is a conventional "recorder interpretations" that perpetuates reading interpretations of innovation through "evidence" of organization relatively stable over time. The triad "object / interpretation / sign" reads like a round trip, generality to generality, to the individual. Some action theory is tested in this paper by the interpretation of innovation, forcing us to clarify, adapt to contact the organization and other probably real-life situations. Agreements produce a "jurisprudence" which becomes part of the interpretation of innovation, adapt and transform it for future actions in the organization. The interpretation of innovation will therefore be enriched by a new experience that tends towards a gradual integration of all areas as possible (from conceptual views).

Suggested Citation

  • Serge Lenga, 2010. "Innovations et organisations : quelles logiques conventionnalistes d'interprétation et d'assimilation en sciences de gestion ?," Post-Print hal-01147929, HAL.
  • Handle: RePEc:hal:journl:hal-01147929
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    To our knowledge, this item is not available for download. To find whether it is available, there are three options:
    1. Check below whether another version of this item is available online.
    2. Check on the provider's web page whether it is in fact available.
    3. Perform a search for a similarly titled item that would be available.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:hal:journl:hal-01147929. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: CCSD (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.