IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/hal/journl/hal-00838366.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Qualitative research with NVIVO : between opportunities to explore and risks to be in distress

Author

Listed:
  • Emmanuel Baudoin

    (Groupe Sup de Co La Rochelle)

  • Stéphanie Chasserio

Abstract

In this paper, we focus on the software NVivo. Its capacity to follow and to support the user in his analytic and reflection process is the main quality of this software. This communication will present the learning outcomes from two different doctoral projects conducted with NVivo. The first research has been conducted in Montreal with 88 extensive semi structured individual interviews. The focus of the second research is the commitment determinants of workers in the context of e-learning at work. The data have been collected through several qualitative methods. In this paper, we share our learning outcomes concerning the use of this software and explain how our research process has been enriched by the use of this tool. We also highlight the difficulties that we met and to share our doubts. We outline the problem of coding and the temptation to go further in depth. Indeed the possibility of micro coding could represent a danger for the researcher who can lose time and his initial object seduced by the microcoding. Moreover, we stress the fantastic possibilities of NVivo concerning the analysis and the right to test ideas. But there are side effects to this flexibility. Through this paper, we highlight how these CAQDAS are powerful and helpful tools. But in the same time, researchers could be seduced by the possibilities of the tool and forget the most important, the results of their research.

Suggested Citation

  • Emmanuel Baudoin & Stéphanie Chasserio, 2009. "Qualitative research with NVIVO : between opportunities to explore and risks to be in distress," Post-Print hal-00838366, HAL.
  • Handle: RePEc:hal:journl:hal-00838366
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    To our knowledge, this item is not available for download. To find whether it is available, there are three options:
    1. Check below whether another version of this item is available online.
    2. Check on the provider's web page whether it is in fact available.
    3. Perform a search for a similarly titled item that would be available.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:hal:journl:hal-00838366. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: CCSD (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.