IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/hal/journl/hal-00781246.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Governance challenges raised by the design of multiple ecosystem services in agricultural landscapes

Author

Listed:
  • Elsa Berthet

    (SADAPT - Sciences pour l'Action et le Développement : Activités, Produits, Territoires - INRA - Institut National de la Recherche Agronomique - AgroParisTech, CGS i3 - Centre de Gestion Scientifique i3 - Mines Paris - PSL (École nationale supérieure des mines de Paris) - PSL - Université Paris Sciences et Lettres - I3 - Institut interdisciplinaire de l’innovation - CNRS - Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique)

  • Blanche Segrestin

    (CGS i3 - Centre de Gestion Scientifique i3 - Mines Paris - PSL (École nationale supérieure des mines de Paris) - PSL - Université Paris Sciences et Lettres - I3 - Institut interdisciplinaire de l’innovation - CNRS - Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique)

  • Vincent Bretagnolle

    (CEBC - Centre d'Études Biologiques de Chizé - INRA - Institut National de la Recherche Agronomique - CNRS - Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique)

Abstract

While Ecosystem services have become the subject of wide attention at the academic and political level, knowledge gaps, complexity and uncertainty make them hard to manage in practice (Seppelt at al., 2011). This presentation proposes an innovative methodological tool to help stakeholders optimize the provision of ecosystem services at a landscape scale, a relevant scale to study both collective action and ecological processes (Prager et al., 2012). We present the results of an on-going case study carried out in a cereal plain in the West of France. It focuses on a pioneering initiative of a cooperative aiming to reconcile agricultural production with environmental protection. Our group of researchers in social and ecological sciences developed a method based on one of the most recent design theories, the Concept-Knowledge theory (Hatchuel & Weil, 2009) with local stakeholders, to involve them in the collective exploration of ecosystem services. Efforts were focused on the reintroduction of grasslands in the cereal crop rotations to improve ecological regulation services (Berthet et al., in press). "Grassland" is a subject of controversy, considered as a natural habitat by ecologists vs. a forage production area by farmers. The collective design method made it possible to identify a conceptual model of grassland and to explore its potential properties, some of which were not known by stakeholders initially. Innovative farming practices were developed, not focused on trade-offs between production and conservation, but rather on the identification of new values that could be created by farmers through a renewed management of ecosystem services. This collective exploration process revealed new interdependences between stakeholders. This paper brings together ecological and managerial knowledge to develop an innovative method aimed at fostering the collective design of ecosystem services at a landscape scale. It also gives useful insights to develop ad-hoc governance strategies.

Suggested Citation

  • Elsa Berthet & Blanche Segrestin & Vincent Bretagnolle, 2012. "Governance challenges raised by the design of multiple ecosystem services in agricultural landscapes," Post-Print hal-00781246, HAL.
  • Handle: RePEc:hal:journl:hal-00781246
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    To our knowledge, this item is not available for download. To find whether it is available, there are three options:
    1. Check below whether another version of this item is available online.
    2. Check on the provider's web page whether it is in fact available.
    3. Perform a search for a similarly titled item that would be available.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:hal:journl:hal-00781246. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: CCSD (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.