Financial Disclosure and the Board: Is Independence of Directors Always Efficient
AbstractIn listed companies, the Board of directors is the ultimate responsible of information disclosure. The "conventional wisdom" considers independence of directors as the essential attribute to improve the quality of that disclosure. In a sense, this approach subordinates expertise to independence. However, effective certification may require finn-specific expertise, in particular for intangible-intensive business models. However, this latter form of expertise is negatively related to independence as it is commonly measured and evaluated. We show that there exists an optimal share of independent directors for each company, related to the magnitude of intangible resources.
Download InfoIf you experience problems downloading a file, check if you have the proper application to view it first. In case of further problems read the IDEAS help page. Note that these files are not on the IDEAS site. Please be patient as the files may be large.
Bibliographic InfoPaper provided by HAL in its series Post-Print with number hal-00442767.
Date of creation: Dec 2009
Date of revision:
Publication status: Published - Presented, Forum de la Regulation 2009, 2009, Paris, France
Note: View the original document on HAL open archive server: http://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-00442767/en/
Contact details of provider:
Web page: http://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/
Board of directors; information disclosure; accounting; intangible resources;
This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:
You can help add them by filling out this form.
reading list or among the top items on IDEAS.Access and download statisticsgeneral information about how to correct material in RePEc.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (CCSD).
If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.