IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/hal/journl/hal-00279611.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Five-Year Assessment of the European Union Research Framework Programmes 1999-2003

Author

Listed:
  • Erkki Ormala

    (Aalto University, NOKIA Research Center - Nokia)

  • Nicholas Vonortas

    (GW - The George Washington University)

  • Ségolène Aymé

    (INSERM - Institut National de la Santé et de la Recherche Médicale)

  • Lucija Čok

    (University of Primorska)

  • Dervilla Donelly

    (DIAS - Dublin Institute for Advanced Studies, UCD - University College Dublin [Dublin])

  • Julia King

    (Imperial College London)

  • Christoph Mandl

    (BOKU - Universität für Bodenkultur Wien = University of Natural Resources and Life [Vienne, Autriche], University of Vienna [Vienna])

  • Frieder Meyer-Krahmer

    (BETA - Bureau d'Économie Théorique et Appliquée - INRA - Institut National de la Recherche Agronomique - UNISTRA - Université de Strasbourg - UL - Université de Lorraine - CNRS - Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique, Fraunhofer ISI - Fraunhofer Institute for Systems and Innovation Research - Fraunhofer-Gesellschaft - Fraunhofer)

  • Elzbieta Helena Oleksy

    (University of Lódź = Uniwersytet Łódzki)

  • Alexandre Quintanilha

    (UFCSPA - Federal University of Health Sciences of Porto Alegre = Universidade Federal de Ciências da Saúde de Porto Alegre)

  • Nicoletta Stame

    (UNIROMA - Università degli Studi di Roma "La Sapienza" = Sapienza University [Rome])

  • Rolf Tarrach

    (University of Luxembourg [Luxembourg], University of Barcelona)

  • Francoise Thys-Clément

    (ULB - Université libre de Bruxelles)

Abstract

In the last semester of 2004, a high level panel chaired by Dr Erkki Ormala, Vice President, Technology Policy, Nokia Corporation and 12 other leading European figures from research policy, management and evaluation, carried out a clear and authoritative overview and assessment of the implementation and achievements of Community research activities for 1999-2003. The analysis, conclusions and recommendations provided by the high level experts are very warmly welcomed and endorsed by the Commission. The experts made a positive assessment of the implementation, results and added value of the Research Framework Programmes, notably in terms of contribution to the development of Europe's innovation and knowledge society. However, they also emphasised the need for a strengthened Framework Programme in response to some major challenges identified by the Panel. A series of recommendations for both current and future programmes were proposed by the Panel to help face these challenges. This brochure contains the full response from the Commission and its Services to the assessment, that is the Commission's communication to the other Institutions, more detailed comments from the Commission Services, as well as the executive summary of the high level Panel's report.

Suggested Citation

  • Erkki Ormala & Nicholas Vonortas & Ségolène Aymé & Lucija Čok & Dervilla Donelly & Julia King & Christoph Mandl & Frieder Meyer-Krahmer & Elzbieta Helena Oleksy & Alexandre Quintanilha & Nicoletta Sta, 2005. "Five-Year Assessment of the European Union Research Framework Programmes 1999-2003," Post-Print hal-00279611, HAL.
  • Handle: RePEc:hal:journl:hal-00279611
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    To our knowledge, this item is not available for download. To find whether it is available, there are three options:
    1. Check below whether another version of this item is available online.
    2. Check on the provider's web page whether it is in fact available.
    3. Perform a search for a similarly titled item that would be available.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:hal:journl:hal-00279611. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: CCSD (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.